Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2012-2016Wisconsin
Leo Musso
S • 5'10" • Waunakee, WI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Leo Musso shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
28.5
Consistency
50.2
Season Value
25.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Wisconsin
121314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Leo Musso, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Wisconsin. Leo Musso shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Wisconsin paired 2 primary output with 40 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 28.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
28.5
Usage
8.4
Consistency
50.2
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 0. LSU: 0. Akron: 1. Georgia State: 0. Michigan State: 0. Michigan: 1.5. Ohio State: 0.5. Iowa: 0. Nebraska: 0. Northwestern: 1. Illinois: 2. Purdue: 1. Minnesota: 1. Penn State: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 9 by 37.5. LSU: 5 by 20.8. Akron: 1 by 14.2. Georgia State: 5 by 20.8. Michigan State: 5 by 20.8. Michigan: 7 by 44.2. Ohio State: 5 by 25.8. Iowa: 4 by 16.7. Nebraska: 6 by 25. Northwestern: 9 by 47.5. Illinois: 4 by 36.7. Purdue: 2 by 18.3. Minnesota: 6 by 35. Penn State: 6 by 35
Split Comparison
Wins0.5 · n=11 · -0.5 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=3 · +0.5 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · n=7 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · n=7 · +0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
47.5 vs Northwestern
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | vs Western Michigan | W 24-16 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Penn State | L 31-38 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Minnesota | W 31-17 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Purdue | W 49-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs IllinoisSplash game | W 48-3 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Northwestern | W 21-7 | 9 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Nebraska | W 23-17 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Iowa | W 17-9 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/16 | vs Ohio State | L 23-30 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Michigan | L 7-14 | 7 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Michigan State | W 30-6 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Georgia State | W 23-17 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Akron | W 54-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs LSU | W 16-14 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 2 | 40 | — | 2 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wisconsin | 9 | 28.5 | 8.4 | 7 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 9 | 28.5 | 8.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Illinois
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.7 takeover score.
#4
Michigan
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 42.1 takeover score.
#5
Northwestern
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 37.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Wisconsin
2 primary output · 40 efficiency · — usage
47.7
#2
2013 Regular Season · Wisconsin
40.5
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
25.2
9 primary · 28.5 efficiency · 8.4 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7793
Waunakee · Waunakee, WI
- Committed To
- Wisconsin
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
74
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.