Usage Score
9.3
Player Dossier
2012-2016Wisconsin
Vince Biegel
OLB • 6'4" • Wisconsin Rapids, WI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Vince Biegel shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
24.4
Consistency
54.8
Season Value
29
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
121314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Vince Biegel, OLB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Wisconsin. Vince Biegel shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 11 primary output with 24.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 24.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
24.4
Usage
9.3
Consistency
54.8
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 2. LSU: 2. Akron: 1. Georgia State: 0. Michigan State: 0. Iowa: 0. Nebraska: 0. Northwestern: 0. Illinois: 1. Purdue: 2. Minnesota: 2. Penn State: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 5 by 40.8. LSU: 4 by 36.7. Akron: 2 by 18.3. Georgia State: 2 by 8.3. Michigan State: 1 by 4.2. Iowa: 1 by 4.2. Nebraska: 5 by 20.8. Northwestern: 1 by 4.2. Illinois: 4 by 26.7. Purdue: 3 by 32.5. Minnesota: 8 by 53.3. Penn State: 8 by 43.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.9 · Games = 11
First Half0.8 · Games = 6 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs First Half
All Games0.9 · Games = 12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
53.3 vs Minnesota
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | vs Western Michigan | W 24-16 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Penn State | L 31-38 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Minnesota | W 31-17 | 8 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Purdue | W 49-20 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Illinois | W 48-3 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Northwestern | W 21-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Nebraska | W 23-17 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Iowa | W 17-9 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Michigan State | W 30-6 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Georgia State | W 23-17 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Akron | W 54-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs LSU | W 16-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wisconsin | 11 | 24.4 | 9.3 | 11 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 11 | 24.4 | 9.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 56.1 takeover score.
#2
Western Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.1 takeover score.
#3
LSU
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.5 takeover score.
#4
Purdue
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.4 takeover score.
#5
Penn State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 33.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
11 primary output · 24.4 efficiency · 9.3 usage
29
#2
2016 Regular Season · Wisconsin
29
11 primary · 24.4 efficiency · 9.3 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Wisconsin
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9388
Lincoln · Wisconsin Rapids, WI
- Committed To
- Wisconsin
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
44
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.