Usage Score
13.6
Player Dossier
2012-2016Purdue
Cameron Posey
WR • 6'1" • Boca Raton, FL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Cameron Posey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
51.8
Consistency
31.6
Season Value
48.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Purdue
1213141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cameron Posey, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Purdue. Cameron Posey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Purdue paired 297 primary output with 64.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 51.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
32.4
Efficiency
51.8
Usage
13.6
Consistency
31.6
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 41. Cincinnati: 9. Nevada: 16. Maryland: 12. Illinois: 15. Nebraska: 29. Penn State: 50. Minnesota: 128. Northwestern: 3. Wisconsin: 12. Indiana: 41
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 5 by 54.7. Cincinnati: 1 by 60. Nevada: 2 by 53.3. Maryland: 2 by 40. Illinois: 2 by 50. Nebraska: 3 by 64.4. Penn State: 8 by 41.7. Minnesota: 7 by 100. Northwestern: 1 by 20. Wisconsin: 2 by 40. Indiana: 6 by 45.6
Split Comparison
Wins15.5 · n=2 · -20 vs Losses
Losses35.5 · n=8 · +20 vs Wins
First Half20.3 · n=6 · -26.5 vs Second Half
Second Half46.8 · n=5 · +26.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
100 vs Minnesota
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Indiana | L 24-26 | — | 6 | 41 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Wisconsin | L 20-49 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Northwestern | L 17-45 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Minnesota100 receiving yards | L 31-44 | — | 7 | 128 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 1 | 89 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Penn StateHigh volume | L 24-62 | — | 8 | 50 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Nebraska | L 14-27 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Illinois | W 34-31 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Maryland | L 7-50 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Nevada | W 24-14 | — | 2 | 16 | 5.7 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Cincinnati | L 20-38 | — | 1 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 41 | 7.5 | 8.20 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Purdue | 297 | 64.6 | 14.6 | 297 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Purdue | 188 | 65.5 | 11.6 | -109 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 255 | 53.6 | 10.2 | 67 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 356 | 51.8 | 13.6 | 101 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
128
Primary metric
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Nebraska
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#3
Northern Illinois
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
64
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Penn State
64
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 71.1 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Purdue
297 primary output · 64.6 efficiency · 14.6 usage
54.9
#2
2014 Regular Season · Purdue
50.3
188 primary · 65.5 efficiency · 11.6 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
48.2
356 primary · 51.8 efficiency · 13.6 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.81
American Heritage Boca/Delray · Delray Beach, FL
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,096
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.