Player Stats

D.J. Foster College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,458
Receptions
222
Touchdowns
32

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2012 PostseasonArizona State13211063.4
2012 Regular SeasonArizona State1336522663.4
2013 PostseasonArizona State14523171.7
2013 Regular SeasonArizona State1458630971.7
2014 PostseasonArizona State13342082.5
2014 Regular SeasonArizona State13596461282.5
2015 PostseasonArizona State13540070.2
2015 Regular SeasonArizona State1354544470.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

Arizona State paired 688 primary output with 75.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 65.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oregon

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Arizona State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

44.9

Efficiency

65.4

Usage

18.3

Consistency

69.6

Best Game by takeover score

Oregon

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 40. Texas A&M: 48. Cal Poly: 58. New Mexico: 16. USC: 67. UCLA: 57. Colorado: 21. Utah: 11. Oregon: 87. Washington State: 71. Washington: 62. Arizona: 14. California: 32

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 5 by 53.3. Texas A&M: 6 by 53.3. Cal Poly: 6 by 64.4. New Mexico: 4 by 26.7. USC: 6 by 74.4. UCLA: 4 by 95. Colorado: 3 by 46.7. Utah: 3 by 24.4. Oregon: 6 by 96.7. Washington State: 7 by 67.6. Washington: 5 by 82.7. Arizona: 1 by 93.3. California: 3 by 71.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins38 · Games = 6 · -12.9 vs Losses
Losses50.9 · Games = 7 · +12.9 vs Wins