Usage Score
20
Player Dossier
2012-2015Purdue
Danny Anthrop
WR • 6'0" • West Lafayette, IN, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Danny Anthrop reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
53
Consistency
58.2
Season Value
49.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Purdue
12131415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Danny Anthrop, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Purdue. Danny Anthrop reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Purdue paired 616 primary output with 86.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 53 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
35.8
Efficiency
53
Usage
20
Consistency
58.2
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 18. Unknown: 23. Virginia Tech: 43. Bowling Green: 40. Michigan State: 42. Minnesota: 59. Wisconsin: 18. Nebraska: 40. Illinois: 20. Northwestern: 14. Iowa: 17. Indiana: 96
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 5 by 24. Unknown: 3 by 51.1. Virginia Tech: 3 by 95.6. Bowling Green: 5 by 53.3. Michigan State: 4 by 70. Minnesota: 5 by 78.7. Wisconsin: 3 by 40. Nebraska: 10 by 26.7. Illinois: 6 by 22.2. Northwestern: 2 by 46.7. Iowa: 2 by 56.7. Indiana: 9 by 71.1
Split Comparison
Losses36.7 · n=10
First Half37.5 · n=6 · +3.3 vs Second Half
Second Half34.2 · n=6 · -3.3 vs First Half
All Games35.8 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
95.6 vs Virginia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs IndianaHigh volume | L 36-54 | — | 9 | 96 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Iowa | L 20-40 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Northwestern | L 14-21 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Illinois | L 14-48 | — | 6 | 20 | 3.3 | 3.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs NebraskaHigh volume | W 55-45 | — | 10 | 40 | 3.5 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Wisconsin | L 7-24 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Minnesota | L 13-41 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Michigan State | L 21-24 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Bowling Green | L 28-35 | — | 5 | 40 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Virginia Tech | L 24-51 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Marshall | L 31-41 | — | 5 | 18 | 2.7 | 3.60 | 1 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Purdue | 25 | 100 | 4.8 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Purdue | 313 | 70.5 | 10.9 | 288 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Purdue | 616 | 86.9 | 23.7 | 303 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 430 | 53 | 20 | -186 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
133
Primary metric
133 receiving yards with a 98.5 efficiency score.
#2
Indiana
151
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
151 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
106
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
25
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
96
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 71.1 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Purdue
616 primary output · 86.9 efficiency · 23.7 usage
69.5
#2
2015 Regular Season · Purdue
49.8
430 primary · 53 efficiency · 20 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Purdue
39.4
313 primary · 70.5 efficiency · 10.9 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8164
Central Catholic · Lafayette, IN
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,384
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.