Usage Score
6.5
Player Dossier
2012-2016Kansas State
DB • 6'1" • Tulsa, OK, USA
Dante Barnett shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28 disruption score.
Usage Score
6.5
Efficiency
28
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
15.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Kansas State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dante Barnett, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Kansas State. Dante Barnett shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Kansas State paired 3 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 28 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
28
Usage
6.5
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 1. Stanford: 3.5. Florida Atlantic: 0. Unknown: 0. West Virginia: 0. Texas Tech: 2. Oklahoma: 0. Texas: 0. Iowa State: 1. Oklahoma State: 0. Baylor: 1. Kansas: 0. TCU: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 6 by 35. Stanford: 4 by 51.7. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. West Virginia: 8 by 33.3. Texas Tech: 4 by 36.7. Oklahoma: 10 by 41.7. Texas: 5 by 20.8. Iowa State: 8 by 43.3. Oklahoma State: 6 by 25. Baylor: 4 by 26.7. Kansas: 4 by 16.7. TCU: 3 by 12.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Stanford
Best efficiency game
51.7 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | vs Texas A&M | W 33-28 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | @ TCU | W 30-6 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Kansas | W 34-19 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Baylor | W 42-21 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Oklahoma State | L 37-43 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Iowa State | W 31-26 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Texas | W 24-21 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Oklahoma10+ tackles | L 17-38 | 10 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Texas Tech | W 44-38 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ West Virginia | L 16-17 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 63-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ StanfordSplash game | L 13-26 | 4 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kansas State
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Kansas State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Kansas State | 4 | 26.7 | — | 4 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Kansas State | 4 | 26.7 | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kansas State | 3 | 20 | — | -1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kansas State | 0 | — | — | -3 |
| 2016 Postseason | Kansas State | 8.5 | 28 | 6.5 | 8.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kansas State | 8.5 | 28 | 6.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Kansas
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#2
Kansas
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
West Virginia
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Oklahoma State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
Stanford
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Kansas State
3 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
41.6
#2
2013 Postseason · Kansas State
30.3
4 primary · 26.7 efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Kansas State
30.3
4 primary · 26.7 efficiency · — usage
4
Impact games
2
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8103
Booker T. Washington · Tulsa, OK
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
67
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Dante Barnett quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit