Usage Score
10
Player Dossier
2012-2016Clemson
DT • 6'3" • Mooresboro, NC, USA
Carlos Watkins shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
10
Efficiency
31.9
Consistency
63.1
Season Value
42.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Carlos Watkins, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Clemson. Carlos Watkins shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.9 disruption score.
Carlos Watkins played DT for Clemson. Across 5 tracked seasons, Carlos Watkins recorded 50 tackles and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Clemson.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Clemson paired 28 primary output with 31.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 31.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
15
Havoc Plays / G
1.9
Efficiency
31.9
Usage
10
Consistency
63.1
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 1. Ohio State: 6. Auburn: 0. Troy: 2. Unknown: 2. Georgia Tech: 2. Louisville: 1. Boston College: 0. NC State: 3. Florida State: 0. Syracuse: 2. Pittsburgh: 2.5. Wake Forest: 2. South Carolina: 2. Virginia Tech: 2.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 6 by 35. Ohio State: 3 by 62.5. Auburn: 3 by 12.5. Troy: 2 by 28.3. Unknown: 1 by 24.2. Georgia Tech: 4 by 36.7. Louisville: 5 by 30.8. Boston College: 2 by 8.3. NC State: 6 by 55. Florida State: 1 by 4.2. Syracuse: 3 by 32.5. Pittsburgh: 4 by 41.7. Wake Forest: 3 by 32.5. South Carolina: 2 by 28.3. Virginia Tech: 5 by 45.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
62.5 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/10 | @ Alabama | W 35-31 | 6 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 1/1 | vs Ohio State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 31-0 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 12/4 | @ Virginia Tech | W 42-35 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/27 | vs South Carolina | W 56-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Wake Forest | W 35-13 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Pittsburgh | L 42-43 | 4 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Syracuse | W 54-0 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Florida State | W 37-34 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs NC State | W 24-17 | 6 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/7 | @ Boston College | W 56-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Louisville | W 42-36 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 9/22 | @ Georgia Tech | W 26-7 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Troy | W 30-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Auburn | W 19-13 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Clemson | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Clemson | 28 | 31.9 | 10 | 27 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 28 | 31.9 | 10 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
App State
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Ohio State
6
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 59.9 takeover score.
#3
NC State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 41 takeover score.
#4
Virginia Tech
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 33.7 takeover score.
#5
Pittsburgh
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 32.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Clemson
28 primary output · 31.9 efficiency · 10 usage
42.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Clemson
42.9
28 primary · 31.9 efficiency · 10 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Clemson
40.8
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9666
Chase · Forest City, NC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
50
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.