Usage Score
10.9
Player Dossier
2012-2016Missouri
Chris Black
WR • 6'0" • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Chris Black reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.8
Consistency
46.5
Season Value
61.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Missouri
121314141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Alabama • Missouri
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Black, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Missouri. Chris Black reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Chris Black played WR for Alabama and Missouri. Across 5 tracked seasons, Chris Black recorded 31 rushing yards, 547 receiving yards, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Missouri.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Missouri paired 257 primary output with 87.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 87.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, Missouri.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Missouri
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
28.6
Efficiency
87.8
Usage
10.9
Consistency
46.5
Best Game by takeover score
Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 102. Eastern Michigan: 0. Georgia: 44. Unknown: 29. LSU: 24. Middle Tennessee: 0. Kentucky: 10. South Carolina: 33. Tennessee: 15
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 6 by 100. Georgia: 3 by 97.8. Unknown: 2 by 96.7. LSU: 3 by 53.3. Kentucky: 1 by 66.7. South Carolina: 1 by 100. Tennessee: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses32.6 · Games = 7
First Half39.8 · Games = 5 · +25.3 vs Second Half
Second Half14.5 · Games = 4 · -25.3 vs First Half
All Games28.6 · Games = 9
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
West Virginia
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | @ Tennessee | L 37-63 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ South Carolina | L 21-31 | — | 1 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Kentucky | L 21-35 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 45-51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ LSU | L 7-42 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Georgia | L 27-28 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 61-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ West Virginia100 receiving yards | L 11-26 | — | 6 | 102 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 26 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2012-2015
Opening stop
- 2
Missouri
2016
Final stop
Season Progression
201220132014201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Alabama | 79 | 75.5 | 10.7 | 79 |
| 2014 Postseason | Alabama | 188 | 63.9 | 10.3 | 109 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Alabama | 188 | 63.9 | 10.3 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Alabama | 23 | 76.7 | 11.1 | -165 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Missouri | 257 | 87.8 | 10.9 | 234 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102
Primary metric
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
101
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia State
54
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Missouri
257 primary output · 87.8 efficiency · 10.9 usage
61.1
#2
2014 Postseason · Alabama
43.3
188 primary · 63.9 efficiency · 10.3 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Alabama
43.3
188 primary · 63.9 efficiency · 10.3 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9772
First Coast · Jacksonville, FL
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
547
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.