Usage Score
11.5
Player Dossier
2012-2016Alabama
Ryan Anderson
LB • 6'2" • Daphne, AL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Ryan Anderson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
37.6
Consistency
75.1
Season Value
46
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Alabama
121314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ryan Anderson, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Alabama. Ryan Anderson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Alabama paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 37.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Alabama
Games
15
Havoc Plays / G
2.1
Efficiency
37.6
Usage
11.5
Consistency
75.1
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112131415
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 3. Washington: 1. USC: 2. Western Kentucky: 2. Ole Miss: 2. Kent State: 1. Kentucky: 2. Arkansas: 3. Tennessee: 2. Texas A&M: 3. LSU: 3. Mississippi State: 3. Unknown: 0. Auburn: 3. Florida: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 7 by 59.2. Washington: 3 by 22.5. USC: 5 by 40.8. Western Kentucky: 3 by 32.5. Ole Miss: 3 by 32.5. Kent State: 1 by 14.2. Kentucky: 3 by 32.5. Arkansas: 9 by 67.5. Tennessee: 2 by 28.3. Texas A&M: 4 by 46.7. LSU: 6 by 55. Mississippi State: 4 by 46.7. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Auburn: 6 by 55. Florida: 3 by 22.5
Split Comparison
Wins2.2 · n=13
First Half2 · n=8 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half2.1 · n=7 · +0.1 vs First Half
All Games2.1 · n=15
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
67.5 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/10 | vs ClemsonSplash game | L 31-35 | 7 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/31 | vs Washington | W 24-7 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Florida | W 54-16 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs AuburnSplash game | W 30-12 | 6 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Mississippi StateSplash game | W 51-3 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/6 | @ LSU | W 10-0 | 6 | 0 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Texas A&MSplash game | W 33-14 | 4 | 4 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Tennessee | W 49-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ ArkansasSplash game | W 49-30 | 9 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Kentucky | W 34-6 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Kent State | W 48-0 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Ole Miss | W 48-43 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Western Kentucky | W 38-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | vs USC | W 52-6 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Alabama | 31 | 37.6 | 11.5 | 31 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Alabama | 31 | 37.6 | 11.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.8 takeover score.
#2
Auburn
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Clemson
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 59.4 takeover score.
#4
LSU
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.6 takeover score.
#5
Mississippi State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Alabama
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2016 Postseason · Alabama
46
31 primary · 37.6 efficiency · 11.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Alabama
46
31 primary · 37.6 efficiency · 11.5 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
5
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9634
Daphne · Daphne, AL
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
61
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.