Usage Score
18.8
Player Dossier
2012-2016San Diego State
WR • 6'1" • San Diego, CA, USA
Eric Judge reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.8
Efficiency
72.6
Consistency
62.8
Season Value
48.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · San Diego State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eric Judge, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · San Diego State. Eric Judge reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
San Diego State paired 471 primary output with 80.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 72.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
30.3
Efficiency
72.6
Usage
18.8
Consistency
62.8
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 54. California: 47. Northern Illinois: 5. South Alabama: 43. Nevada: 16. Wyoming: 17
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 5 by 72. California: 4 by 78.3. Northern Illinois: 1 by 33.3. South Alabama: 3 by 95.6. Nevada: 1 by 100. Wyoming: 2 by 56.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Nevada
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
San Diego State
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | San Diego State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Postseason | San Diego State | 218 | 80 | 11 | 218 |
| 2013 Regular Season | San Diego State | 218 | 80 | 11 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | San Diego State | 471 | 80.9 | 17.4 | 253 |
| 2014 Regular Season | San Diego State | 471 | 80.9 | 17.4 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | San Diego State | 296 | 80.7 | 16.6 | -175 |
| 2016 Regular Season | San Diego State | 182 | 72.6 | 18.8 | -114 |
#1 Featured game
Hawai'i
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
92
Primary metric
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Idaho
107
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Fresno State
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
54
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 72 efficiency score.
#5
North Carolina
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · San Diego State
471 primary output · 80.9 efficiency · 17.4 usage
63.9
#2
2014 Regular Season · San Diego State
63.9
471 primary · 80.9 efficiency · 17.4 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · San Diego State
54.8
296 primary · 80.7 efficiency · 16.6 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8148
San Diego Scpa · San Diego, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,167
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Eric Judge quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit