Player Stats

Alex Barrett College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
53
TFL
13
Sacks
7.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
4
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonSan Diego State00-0--0-
2013 Regular SeasonSan Diego State00-0--0-
2014 Regular SeasonSan Diego State00-0--0-
2015 PostseasonSan Diego State20-0--142.6
2015 Regular SeasonSan Diego State20-0--042.6
2016 PostseasonSan Diego State14421--069
2016 Regular SeasonSan Diego State1449116.514069

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

San Diego State paired 25.5 primary output with 31.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 31.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: New Hampshire

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · San Diego State

Games

14

Havoc Plays / G

1.8

Efficiency

31.8

Usage

13.3

Consistency

44.1

Best Game by takeover score

New Hampshire

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Houston: 3. New Hampshire: 8. California: 2. Northern Illinois: 3. South Alabama: 0. UNLV: 2. Fresno State: 2. San José State: 1. Utah State: 2. Hawai'i: 1. Nevada: 0.5. Wyoming: 0. Colorado State: 1. Wyoming: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 4 by 46.7. New Hampshire: 5 by 70.8. California: 4 by 36.7. Northern Illinois: 4 by 46.7. South Alabama: 5 by 20.8. UNLV: 4 by 36.7. Fresno State: 3 by 32.5. San José State: 3 by 22.5. Utah State: 5 by 40.8. Hawai'i: 1 by 14.2. Nevada: 3 by 17.5. Wyoming: 5 by 20.8. Colorado State: 5 by 30.8. Wyoming: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.2 · Games = 11 · +1.9 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 3 · -1.9 vs Wins