Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Ohio State paired 781 primary output with 82.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Michael Thomas College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 1,602
- Receptions
- 113
- Touchdowns
- 18
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio State | 3 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 36.8 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Postseason | Ohio State | 15 | 11 | 119 | 1 | 82.7 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio State | 15 | 43 | 680 | 8 | 82.7 |
| 2015 Postseason | Ohio State | 13 | 7 | 72 | 1 | 85.1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio State | 13 | 49 | 709 | 8 | 85.1 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
60.1
Efficiency
82.2
Usage
26.7
Consistency
71.7
Best Game by takeover score
Maryland
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 72. Virginia Tech: 46. Hawai'i: 52. Northern Illinois: 60. Western Michigan: 80. Indiana: 54. Maryland: 107. Penn State: 34. Rutgers: 103. Minnesota: 39. Illinois: 76. Michigan State: 8. Michigan: 50
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 7 by 68.6. Virginia Tech: 2 by 100. Hawai'i: 5 by 69.3. Northern Illinois: 3 by 100. Western Michigan: 6 by 88.9. Indiana: 4 by 90. Maryland: 7 by 100. Penn State: 3 by 75.6. Rutgers: 5 by 100. Minnesota: 4 by 65. Illinois: 6 by 84.4. Michigan State: 2 by 26.7. Michigan: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins64.4 · Games = 12 · +56.4 vs Losses
Losses8 · Games = 1 · -56.4 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Michael Thomas
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.