Usage Score
9.9
Player Dossier
2012-2016Temple
Romond Deloatch
TE • 6'4" • Hampton, VA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Romond Deloatch reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68
Consistency
46.6
Season Value
55.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Temple
12131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Romond Deloatch, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Temple. Romond Deloatch reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Temple paired 242 primary output with 68 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Temple
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
18.6
Efficiency
68
Usage
9.9
Consistency
46.6
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 4. Army: 0. Unknown: 26. Penn State: 67. Charlotte: 40. SMU: 34. Memphis: 19. UCF: 7. South Florida: 16. Cincinnati: 3. UConn: 18. Tulane: 8. East Carolina: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 1 by 26.7. Unknown: 2 by 86.7. Penn State: 1 by 100. Charlotte: 3 by 88.9. SMU: 1 by 100. Memphis: 5 by 25.3. UCF: 1 by 46.7. South Florida: 1 by 100. Cincinnati: 1 by 20. UConn: 1 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins15.8 · n=8 · -6.8 vs Losses
Losses22.5 · n=4 · +6.8 vs Wins
First Half27.1 · n=7 · +18.5 vs Second Half
Second Half8.7 · n=6 · -18.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
100 vs UConn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | @ Wake Forest | L 26-34 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 11/27 | vs East Carolina | W 37-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Tulane | W 31-0 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Fri 11/4 | @ UConn | W 21-0 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Cincinnati | W 34-13 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Fri 10/21 | vs South Florida | W 46-30 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ UCF | W 26-25 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Fri 10/7 | @ Memphis | L 27-34 | — | 5 | 19 | 3.8 | 3.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs SMU | W 45-20 | — | 1 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Charlotte | W 48-20 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Penn State | L 27-34 | — | 1 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 0 | 67 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 21 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Army | L 13-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Temple | 42 | 70 | 33.3 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Temple | 35 | 75 | 7.2 | -7 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Temple | 169 | 66.4 | 9.1 | 134 |
| 2015 Postseason | Temple | 155 | 55.8 | 11 | -14 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Temple | 155 | 55.8 | 11 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Temple | 242 | 68 | 9.9 | 87 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Temple | 242 | 68 | 9.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58
Primary metric
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Penn State
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Cincinnati
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.
#5
Tulane
49
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Temple
242 primary output · 68 efficiency · 9.9 usage
55.5
#2
2016 Regular Season · Temple
55.5
242 primary · 68 efficiency · 9.9 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Temple
55.1
42 primary · 70 efficiency · 33.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.835
Phoebus · Hampton, VA
- Committed To
- Temple
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
643
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.