Usage Score
27.6
Player Dossier
2012-2016Syracuse
WR • 6'2" • Powder Springs, GA, USA
Amba Etta-Tawo reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
27.6
Efficiency
88.9
Consistency
65.4
Season Value
70.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Syracuse
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Amba Etta-Tawo, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Syracuse. Amba Etta-Tawo reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Amba Etta-Tawo played WR for Maryland and Syracuse. Across 5 tracked seasons, Amba Etta-Tawo recorded 2,420 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 17 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Syracuse.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Syracuse paired 1,482 primary output with 88.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 88.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Maryland, Syracuse.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
123.5
Efficiency
88.9
Usage
27.6
Consistency
65.4
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 210. Louisville: 103. South Florida: 123. UConn: 270. Notre Dame: 134. Wake Forest: 36. Virginia Tech: 54. Boston College: 144. Clemson: 84. NC State: 88. Florida State: 58. Pittsburgh: 178
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 12 by 100. Louisville: 8 by 85.8. South Florida: 8 by 100. UConn: 12 by 100. Notre Dame: 7 by 100. Wake Forest: 4 by 60. Virginia Tech: 5 by 72. Boston College: 10 by 96. Clemson: 9 by 62.2. NC State: 4 by 100. Florida State: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 13 by 91.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UConn
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Pittsburgh100 receiving yards · High volume | L 61-76 | — | 13 | 178 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 5 | 49 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Florida State | L 14-45 | — | 2 | 58 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs NC State | L 20-35 | — | 4 | 88 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 81 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ ClemsonHigh volume | L 0-54 | — | 9 | 84 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Boston College100 receiving yards · High volume | W 28-20 | — | 10 | 144 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 68 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Virginia Tech | W 31-17 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Wake Forest | L 9-28 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Notre Dame100 receiving yards | L 33-50 | — | 7 | 134 | 19.1 | 19.10 | 1 | 72 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ UConn100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-24 | — | 12 | 270 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 2 | 59 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs South Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-45 | — | 8 | 123 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Louisville100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-62 | — | 8 | 103 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 2 | 47 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 12 | 210 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 43 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Maryland
2012-2015
Opening stop
Syracuse
2016
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Maryland | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Maryland | 500 | 83.3 | 19.4 | 500 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Maryland | 500 | 83.3 | 19.4 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Maryland | 222 | 95.6 | 10.5 | -278 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Maryland | 222 | 95.6 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Maryland | 216 | 71.2 | 16.4 | -6 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Syracuse | 1,482 | 88.9 | 27.6 | 1,266 |
#1 Featured game
UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
270
Primary metric
270 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Syracuse
109
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
NC State
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
71
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Syracuse
1,482 primary output · 88.9 efficiency · 27.6 usage
70.2
#2
2013 Postseason · Maryland
51.1
500 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 19.4 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Maryland
51.1
500 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 19.4 usage
9
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8283
McEachern · Powder Springs, GA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,420
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.