Usage Score
10.8
Player Dossier
2012-2016Northwestern
WR • 6'2" • Royersford, PA, USA
Andrew Scanlan reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.8
Efficiency
68.6
Consistency
44.7
Season Value
56
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Northwestern
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Scanlan, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Northwestern. Andrew Scanlan reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Andrew Scanlan played WR for Northwestern. Across 5 tracked seasons, Andrew Scanlan recorded 336 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Northwestern.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Northwestern paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
25.5
Efficiency
68.6
Usage
10.8
Consistency
44.7
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 35. Western Michigan: 19. Unknown: 5. Duke: 8. Nebraska: 8. Iowa: 18. Michigan State: 32. Indiana: 23. Ohio State: 0. Wisconsin: 46. Purdue: 78. Minnesota: 54. Illinois: 5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 4 by 58.3. Western Michigan: 2 by 63.3. Unknown: 1 by 33.3. Duke: 1 by 53.3. Nebraska: 1 by 53.3. Iowa: 1 by 100. Michigan State: 2 by 100. Indiana: 2 by 76.7. Wisconsin: 5 by 61.3. Purdue: 5 by 100. Minnesota: 4 by 90. Illinois: 1 by 33.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | vs Pittsburgh | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Illinois | W 42-21 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Minnesota | L 12-29 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Purdue | W 45-17 | — | 5 | 78 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Wisconsin | L 7-21 | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Ohio State | L 20-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Indiana | W 24-14 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Michigan State | W 54-40 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Iowa | W 38-31 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Nebraska | L 13-24 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs Duke | W 24-13 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Western Michigan | L 21-22 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Northwestern
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Northwestern | 5 | 33.3 | 3.1 | 5 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | 0 | -5 |
| 2016 Postseason | Northwestern | 331 | 68.6 | 10.8 | 331 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Northwestern | 331 | 68.6 | 10.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78
Primary metric
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Minnesota
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan State
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Wisconsin
46
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 61.3 efficiency score.
#5
Minnesota
5
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Northwestern
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2016 Postseason · Northwestern
56
331 primary · 68.6 efficiency · 10.8 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Northwestern
56
331 primary · 68.6 efficiency · 10.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8239
Spring-Ford · Royersford, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
336
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.