Player Dossier

2012-2016

Northwestern

Andrew Scanlan

WR • 6'2" • Royersford, PA, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Andrew Scanlan reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

10.8

Efficiency

68.6

Consistency

44.7

Season Value

56

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Northwestern

121314151616

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
Northwestern
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Andrew Scanlan, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Northwestern. Andrew Scanlan reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Andrew Scanlan played WR for Northwestern. Across 5 tracked seasons, Andrew Scanlan recorded 336 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Northwestern.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

Northwestern paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 68.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Purdue

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Northwestern

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

25.5

Efficiency

68.6

Usage

10.8

Consistency

44.7

Best Game by takeover score

Pittsburgh

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 35. Western Michigan: 19. Unknown: 5. Duke: 8. Nebraska: 8. Iowa: 18. Michigan State: 32. Indiana: 23. Ohio State: 0. Wisconsin: 46. Purdue: 78. Minnesota: 54. Illinois: 5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 4 by 58.3. Western Michigan: 2 by 63.3. Unknown: 1 by 33.3. Duke: 1 by 53.3. Nebraska: 1 by 53.3. Iowa: 1 by 100. Michigan State: 2 by 100. Indiana: 2 by 76.7. Wisconsin: 5 by 61.3. Purdue: 5 by 100. Minnesota: 4 by 90. Illinois: 1 by 33.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins28.4 · Games = 7 · +3.0 vs Losses
Losses25.4 · Games = 5 · -3.0 vs Wins
First Half17.9 · Games = 7 · -16.5 vs Second Half
Second Half34.3 · Games = 6 · +16.5 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Purdue

Best efficiency game

100 vs Purdue

Result
Wed 12/28vs PittsburghW 31-244358.88.80017
Sat 11/26vs IllinoisW 42-21155505
Sat 11/19@ MinnesotaL 12-2945413.513.50025
Sat 11/12@ PurdueW 45-1757815.615.60031
Sat 11/5vs WisconsinL 7-215469.29.20019
Sat 10/29@ Ohio StateL 20-24
Sat 10/22vs IndianaW 24-1422311.511.50016
Sat 10/15@ Michigan StateW 54-402321616020
Sat 10/1@ IowaW 38-311181818018
Sat 9/24vs NebraskaL 13-24188808
Sun 9/18vs DukeW 24-13188808
Sat 9/10vs Unknown155505
Sat 9/3vs Western MichiganL 21-222199.59.50013

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Northwestern

    2012-2016

    Opening stop

Season Progression

201220132014201520162016
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2012 Regular SeasonNorthwestern0
2013 Regular SeasonNorthwestern00
2014 Regular SeasonNorthwestern533.33.15
2015 Regular SeasonNorthwestern00-5
2016 PostseasonNorthwestern33168.610.8331
2016 Regular SeasonNorthwestern33168.610.80

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Purdue

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

78

Primary metric

78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Minnesota

54

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

54 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.

#3

Michigan State

32

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Wisconsin

46

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

46 receiving yards with a 61.3 efficiency score.

#5

Minnesota

5

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2013 Regular Season · Northwestern

0 primary output · efficiency · usage

100

#2

2016 Postseason · Northwestern

56

331 primary · 68.6 efficiency · 10.8 usage

#3

2016 Regular Season · Northwestern

56

331 primary · 68.6 efficiency · 10.8 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2012 · Rating 0.8239

Spring-Ford · Royersford, PA

Committed To
Northwestern
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2012

Career Facts

1

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

336

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.