Player Stats

Andy Janovich College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
358
Rushing yards
271
Receiving yards
87
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonNebraska219613029.8
2013 Regular SeasonNebraska1000050
2014 PostseasonNebraska2000039.4
2014 Regular SeasonNebraska216016039.4
2015 PostseasonNebraska931310154.5
2015 Regular SeasonNebraska929223458254.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Nebraska paired 323 primary output with 51.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 51.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss

Win with 121 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Nebraska

Games

9

Scrimmage Yards / G

35.9

Efficiency

51.1

Usage

9.2

Consistency

40.4

Best Game by takeover score

Southern Miss

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 31. Southern Miss: 121. Illinois: 48. Wisconsin: 59. Minnesota: 27. Northwestern: 4. Purdue: 2. Michigan State: 26. Rutgers: 5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 6 by 53.8. Southern Miss: 6 by 100. Illinois: 12 by 41.1. Wisconsin: 3 by 100. Minnesota: 7 by 40.2. Northwestern: 2 by 20.8. Purdue: 2 by 10.4. Michigan State: 4 by 67.7. Rutgers: 2 by 26

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins42 · Games = 5 · +13.8 vs Losses
Losses28.3 · Games = 4 · -13.8 vs Wins