Player Stats

Carlos Wiggins College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
560
Receptions
36
Touchdowns
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonNew Mexico12983247.5
2013 Regular SeasonNew Mexico1213163756.2
2014 Regular SeasonNew Mexico7281245.3
2015 PostseasonNew Mexico13-0070.3
2015 Regular SeasonNew Mexico1312233270.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

New Mexico paired 233 primary output with 75.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 75.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · New Mexico

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

17.9

Efficiency

75.1

Usage

16.4

Consistency

51.3

Best Game by takeover score

Wyoming

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 0. Mississippi Valley State: 19. Tulsa: 39. Arizona State: 18. Wyoming: 64. New Mexico State: 0. Nevada: 0. Hawai'i: 29. San José State: 18. Utah State: 0. Boise State: 2. Colorado State: 0. Air Force: 44

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi Valley State: 2 by 63.3. Tulsa: 1 by 100. Arizona State: 2 by 60. Wyoming: 1 by 100. Hawai'i: 3 by 64.4. San José State: 1 by 100. Boise State: 1 by 13.3. Air Force: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins22.6 · Games = 7 · +10.1 vs Losses
Losses12.5 · Games = 6 · -10.1 vs Wins