Player Stats

Simms McElfresh College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
950
Receptions
80
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonApp State1242484770.3
2015 PostseasonApp State11542083.2
2015 Regular SeasonApp State1133424783.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

App State paired 466 primary output with 75.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 75.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · App State

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

42.4

Efficiency

75.8

Usage

25.8

Consistency

74.8

Best Game by takeover score

South Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 42. Howard: 51. Clemson: 12. Wyoming: 18. Georgia State: 58. UL Monroe: 49. Georgia Southern: 66. Troy: 7. Arkansas State: 47. Louisiana: 44. South Alabama: 72

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 5 by 56. Howard: 4 by 85. Clemson: 2 by 40. Wyoming: 1 by 100. Georgia State: 3 by 100. UL Monroe: 2 by 100. Georgia Southern: 6 by 73.3. Troy: 2 by 23.3. Arkansas State: 4 by 78.3. Louisiana: 3 by 97.8. South Alabama: 6 by 80

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins45.2 · Games = 9 · +15.7 vs Losses
Losses29.5 · Games = 2 · -15.7 vs Wins