Usage Score
4.4
Player Dossier
2014-2016App State
Alex Gray
DB • 6'3" • Suwanee, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Alex Gray shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
16.8
Consistency
2.8
Season Value
6.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · App State
14151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- App State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alex Gray, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · App State. Alex Gray shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
App State paired 2 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 16.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia State
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · App State
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.1
Efficiency
16.8
Usage
4.4
Consistency
2.8
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 0. Tennessee: 0. Miami: 0. Akron: 0. Georgia State: 1. Louisiana: 0. Idaho: 0. Georgia Southern: 0. Texas State: 0. Troy: 0. UL Monroe: 0. New Mexico State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 4 by 16.7. Tennessee: 3 by 12.5. Miami: 3 by 12.5. Akron: 4 by 16.7. Georgia State: 3 by 22.5. Louisiana: 3 by 12.5. Idaho: 6 by 25. Georgia Southern: 2 by 8.3. Texas State: 5 by 20.8. Troy: 4 by 16.7. UL Monroe: 6 by 25. New Mexico State: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.1 · Games = 9 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.2 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 6 · -0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Georgia State
Best efficiency game
25 vs UL Monroe
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | @ Toledo | W 31-28 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ New Mexico State | W 37-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UL Monroe | W 42-17 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Troy | L 24-28 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Texas State | W 35-10 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/27 | @ Georgia Southern | W 34-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Idaho | W 37-19 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/13 | @ Louisiana | W 24-0 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Georgia State | W 17-3 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Akron | W 45-38 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Miami | L 10-45 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 9/1 | @ Tennessee | L 13-20 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
App State
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | App State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | App State | 2 | 20 | — | 2 |
| 2016 Postseason | App State | 1 | 16.8 | 4.4 | -1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | App State | 1 | 16.8 | 4.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Alabama
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Georgia Southern
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Georgia State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 47.2 takeover score.
#4
Idaho
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 9.9 takeover score.
#5
UL Monroe
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 9.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · App State
2 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
41.6
#2
2016 Postseason · App State
6.6
1 primary · 16.8 efficiency · 4.4 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · App State
6.6
1 primary · 16.8 efficiency · 4.4 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8315
Lennard · Ruskin, FL
- Committed To
- South Florida
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
46
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.