Usage Score
11.9
Player Dossier
2012-2015Colorado State
WR • 5'10" • Highlands Ranch, CO, USA
Joe Hansley reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11.9
Efficiency
80.9
Consistency
49.5
Season Value
51.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Colorado State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joe Hansley, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Colorado State. Joe Hansley reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Colorado State paired 613 primary output with 74 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
31.9
Efficiency
80.9
Usage
11.9
Consistency
49.5
Best Game by takeover score
Nevada
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nevada: 31. Unknown: 67. Minnesota: 59. Colorado: 23. UTSA: 12. Utah State: 23. Boise State: 13. Air Force: 75. San Diego State: 36. Wyoming: 7. UNLV: 7. New Mexico: 16. Fresno State: 46
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nevada: 2 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 89.3. Minnesota: 2 by 100. Colorado: 3 by 51.1. UTSA: 1 by 80. Utah State: 3 by 51.1. Boise State: 1 by 86.7. Air Force: 3 by 100. San Diego State: 2 by 100. Wyoming: 1 by 46.7. UNLV: 1 by 46.7. New Mexico: 1 by 100. Fresno State: 3 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs Nevada
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/30 | vs Nevada | L 23-28 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/29 | @ Fresno State | W 34-31 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ New Mexico | W 28-21 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs UNLV | W 49-35 | — | 1 | 7 | 6.5 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Wyoming | W 26-7 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs San Diego State | L 17-41 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Air Force2+ TD | W 38-23 | — | 3 | 75 | 19.8 | 25 | 2 | 44 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Boise State | L 10-41 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Utah State | L 18-33 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ UTSA | W 33-31 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Colorado | L 24-27 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Minnesota | L 20-23 | — | 2 | 59 | 20 | 29.50 | 1 | 49 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 1 | 19 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Colorado State
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Colorado State | 274 | 71.2 | 14.7 | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Colorado State | 613 | 74 | 20.3 | 339 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Colorado State | 613 | 74 | 20.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Colorado State | 540 | 78.2 | 15.5 | -73 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Colorado State | 540 | 78.2 | 15.5 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Colorado State | 415 | 80.9 | 11.9 | -125 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Colorado State | 415 | 80.9 | 11.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
New Mexico
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102
Primary metric
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Boise State
149
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 85.7 efficiency score.
#4
UTEP
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Air Force
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Colorado State
613 primary output · 74 efficiency · 20.3 usage
65
#2
2013 Regular Season · Colorado State
65
613 primary · 74 efficiency · 20.3 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Colorado State
57.9
540 primary · 78.2 efficiency · 15.5 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7783
Highlands Ranch · Littleton, CO
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,842
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Joe Hansley quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit