Usage / Role
68%
Regular defensive contributor
Player Dossier
2013-2016Toledo
DT • 6'3" • Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Treyvon Hester shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.7 disruption score.
Usage / Role
68%
Regular defensive contributor
Impact Production
100
Top-tier box-score impact for a defensive lineman
Reliability
76
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
91
Elite ceiling indicators
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Toledo
Snapshot
Player Story
Treyvon Hester built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a defensive tackle from Pittsburgh, PA wearing No. 91, spending time with Toledo. The clearest part of Treyvon Hester's career was his defensive...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Treyvon Hester, DT. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Toledo. Treyvon Hester shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.7 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 10 | 39 | 8.5 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 74.5 |
Related Context
Treyvon Hester played DT for Toledo. Across 4 tracked seasons, Treyvon Hester recorded 39 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Toledo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Toledo paired 21.5 primary output with 37.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 37.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
2.1
Efficiency
37.7
Usage
10.9
Consistency
69.6
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 2. Maine: 2. Fresno State: 4.5. BYU: 3. Eastern Michigan: 2. Bowling Green: 2. Central Michigan: 2. Ohio: 4. Ball State: 0. Western Michigan: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 5 by 40.8. Maine: 3 by 32.5. Fresno State: 5 by 65.8. BYU: 5 by 50.8. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 32.5. Bowling Green: 2 by 28.3. Central Michigan: 1 by 24.2. Ohio: 3 by 52.5. Ball State: 4 by 16.7. Western Michigan: 8 by 33.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Fresno State
Best efficiency game
65.8 vs Fresno State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | @ Western Michigan | L 35-55 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/17 | vs Ball State | W 37-19 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/27 | vs OhioSplash game | L 26-31 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Central MichiganSplash game | W 31-17 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Bowling GreenSplash game | W 42-35 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Eastern MichiganSplash game | W 35-20 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ BYUSplash game | L 53-55 | 5 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Fresno State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 52-17 | 5 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs MaineSplash game | W 45-3 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Arkansas StateSplash game | W 31-10 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Treyvon Hester built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a defensive tackle from Pittsburgh, PA wearing No. 91, spending time with Toledo. The clearest part of Treyvon Hester's career was his defensive production: 39 tackles, 8.5 tackles for loss, 5 sacks, and 1 pass defended across 10 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with Toledo. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Defensive careers can be hard to read from one number, but Treyvon Hester's production has multiple signals. With 10 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Toledo.
The arc is straightforward: Treyvon Hester moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 21.5 | 37.7 | 10.9 | 21.5 |
#1 Featured game
vs Fresno State
Week 3 · W 52-17
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5
Havoc Plays
88.6 takeover
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 88.6 takeover score.
#2
vs Ohio
Week 9 · L 26-31 · Conference game
4
Havoc Plays
80.5 takeover
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 80.5 takeover score.
#3
@ BYU
Week 5 · L 53-55
3
Havoc Plays
72.5 takeover
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 72.5 takeover score.
#4
@ Arkansas State
Week 1 · W 31-10
2
Havoc Plays
59.2 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 59.2 takeover score.
#5
@ Eastern Michigan
Week 6 · W 35-20 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
59 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 59 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Toledo
21.5 primary output · 37.7 efficiency · 10.9 usage
74.5
#2
2013 Regular Season · Toledo
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Toledo
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
3
Impact games
8
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.