Usage Score
8.8
Player Dossier
2013-2016Toledo
Treyvon Hester
DT • 6'3" • Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Treyvon Hester shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
30.7
Consistency
50
Season Value
31.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Toledo
13141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Treyvon Hester, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Toledo. Treyvon Hester shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.7 disruption score.
Treyvon Hester played DT for Toledo. Across 4 tracked seasons, Treyvon Hester recorded 39 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Toledo.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Toledo paired 14.5 primary output with 30.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 30.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Toledo
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
30.7
Usage
8.8
Consistency
50
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 2. Unknown: 2. Fresno State: 4.5. BYU: 3. Eastern Michigan: 0. Bowling Green: 1. Central Michigan: 0. Ohio: 2. Ball State: 0. Western Michigan: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 5 by 40.8. Unknown: 3 by 32.5. Fresno State: 5 by 65.8. BYU: 5 by 50.8. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 12.5. Bowling Green: 2 by 18.3. Central Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Ohio: 3 by 32.5. Ball State: 4 by 16.7. Western Michigan: 8 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.3 · Games = 6 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses1.7 · Games = 3 · +0.4 vs Wins
First Half2.3 · Games = 5 · +1.7 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · Games = 5 · -1.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Fresno State
Best efficiency game
65.8 vs Fresno State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | @ Western Michigan | L 35-55 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/17 | vs Ball State | W 37-19 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/27 | vs Ohio | L 26-31 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Central Michigan | W 31-17 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Bowling Green | W 42-35 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 35-20 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ BYUSplash game | L 53-55 | 5 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Fresno State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 52-17 | 5 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Arkansas State | W 31-10 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 14.5 | 30.7 | 8.8 | 14.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Fresno State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.4 takeover score.
#2
BYU
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 47.5 takeover score.
#3
Arkansas State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 32.1 takeover score.
#4
Ohio
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 29.2 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 28.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Toledo
14.5 primary output · 30.7 efficiency · 8.8 usage
31.4
#2
2013 Regular Season · Toledo
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Toledo
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8167
Penn Hills · Pittsburgh, PA
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
39
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.