Usage Score
24.7
Player Dossier
2012-2016Ohio
Sebastian Smith
WR • 6'3" • Columbus, OH, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Sebastian Smith reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
91.7
Consistency
59.6
Season Value
69
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio
12131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Ohio
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sebastian Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio. Sebastian Smith reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Ohio paired 905 primary output with 91.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 91.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Ohio
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
69.6
Efficiency
91.7
Usage
24.7
Consistency
59.6
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 28. Texas State: 33. Tennessee: 156. Unknown: 108. Miami (OH): 12. Bowling Green: 72. Eastern Michigan: 123. Kent State: 58. Toledo: 90. Buffalo: 51. Central Michigan: 92. Akron: 30. Western Michigan: 52
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 2 by 93.3. Texas State: 3 by 73.3. Tennessee: 9 by 100. Unknown: 6 by 100. Miami (OH): 1 by 80. Bowling Green: 5 by 96. Eastern Michigan: 8 by 100. Kent State: 4 by 96.7. Toledo: 4 by 100. Buffalo: 3 by 100. Central Michigan: 4 by 100. Akron: 3 by 66.7. Western Michigan: 4 by 86.7
Split Comparison
Wins52.2 · n=6 · -28.5 vs Losses
Losses80.7 · n=6 · +28.5 vs Wins
First Half76 · n=7 · +13.8 vs Second Half
Second Half62.2 · n=6 · -13.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Central Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/24 | @ Troy | L 23-28 | — | 2 | 28 | 11 | 14 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Western Michigan | L 23-29 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 18 |
| Wed 11/23 | vs Akron | W 9-3 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Wed 11/16 | @ Central Michigan | L 20-27 | — | 4 | 92 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 53 |
| Thu 11/3 | vs Buffalo | W 34-10 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 33 |
| Thu 10/27 | @ Toledo | W 31-26 | — | 4 | 90 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Kent State | W 14-10 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-27 | — | 8 | 123 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Bowling Green | W 30-24 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Miami (OH) | W 17-7 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 6 | 108 | 18 | 18 | 2 | 48 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Tennessee100 receiving yards · High volume | L 19-28 | — | 9 | 156 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Texas State | L 54-56 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio | 82 | 42.1 | 10.2 | 82 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio | 385 | 76.3 | 16.7 | 303 |
| 2015 Postseason | Ohio | 775 | 73.8 | 25.9 | 390 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio | 775 | 73.8 | 25.9 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio | 905 | 91.7 | 24.7 | 130 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio | 905 | 91.7 | 24.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
156
Primary metric
156 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ball State
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 84.8 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
82
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
123
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Ohio
905 primary output · 91.7 efficiency · 24.7 usage
69
#2
2016 Regular Season · Ohio
69
905 primary · 91.7 efficiency · 24.7 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Ohio
65.3
775 primary · 73.8 efficiency · 25.9 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8664
Pickerington Central · Pickerington, OH
- Committed To
- Ohio
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,147
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.