Usage Score
24.2
Player Dossier
2012-2016Ohio
WR • 6'3" • Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Jordan Reid reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
24.2
Efficiency
68
Consistency
52.3
Season Value
61.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Reid, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Ohio. Jordan Reid reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Ohio paired 616 primary output with 79.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Troy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
46.8
Efficiency
68
Usage
24.2
Consistency
52.3
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 162. Texas State: 93. Kansas: 59. Tennessee: 29. Unknown: 10. Miami (OH): 38. Bowling Green: 54. Eastern Michigan: 41. Kent State: 14. Toledo: 13. Buffalo: 8. Central Michigan: 50. Akron: 62. Western Michigan: 22
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 12 by 90. Texas State: 5 by 100. Kansas: 4 by 98.3. Tennessee: 4 by 48.3. Unknown: 3 by 22.2. Miami (OH): 4 by 63.3. Bowling Green: 4 by 90. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 54.7. Kent State: 2 by 46.7. Toledo: 1 by 86.7. Buffalo: 1 by 53.3. Central Michigan: 5 by 66.7. Akron: 5 by 82.7. Western Michigan: 3 by 48.9
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Troy
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/24 | @ Troy100 receiving yards · High volume | L 23-28 | — | 12 | 162 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Western Michigan2+ TD | L 23-29 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 2 | 9 |
| Wed 11/23 | vs Akron | W 9-3 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 32 |
| Wed 11/16 | @ Central Michigan | L 20-27 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 24 |
| Thu 11/3 | vs Buffalo | W 34-10 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Thu 10/27 | @ Toledo | W 31-26 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Kent State | W 14-10 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 20-27 | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Bowling Green | W 30-24 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Miami (OH) | W 17-7 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 3.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Tennessee | L 19-28 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Kansas | W 37-21 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Texas State2+ TD | L 54-56 | — | 5 | 93 | 18.6 | 18.60 | 2 | 39 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Ohio | 61 | 63.3 | 6.2 | 61 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio | 61 | 63.3 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio | 326 | 75.2 | 13.2 | 265 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio | 616 | 79.1 | 24 | 290 |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio | 655 | 68 | 24.2 | 39 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio | 655 | 68 | 24.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Troy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
162
Primary metric
162 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
109
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
112
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Akron
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Ohio
616 primary output · 79.1 efficiency · 24 usage
66.5
#2
2016 Postseason · Ohio
61.1
655 primary · 68 efficiency · 24.2 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Ohio
61.1
655 primary · 68 efficiency · 24.2 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7383
Parkview · Lilburn, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,658
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jordan Reid quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit