Player Stats

Daz'mond Patterson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,653
Rushing yards
1,251
Receiving yards
402
Touchdowns
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 PostseasonOhio1236360040.8
2012 Regular SeasonOhio1225715998240.8
2013 PostseasonOhio111052877140.8
2013 Regular SeasonOhio1122618343240.8
2014 Regular SeasonOhio12464348116155.2
2015 PostseasonOhio1219019066.8
2015 Regular SeasonOhio1254649749966.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Ohio paired 565 primary output with 48.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 48.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Idaho

Win with 91 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Ohio

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

47.1

Efficiency

48.3

Usage

17.5

Consistency

68.9

Best Game by takeover score

Idaho

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. App State: 19. Idaho: 91. Marshall: 69. SE Louisiana: 21. Minnesota: 71. Akron: 14. Miami (OH): 48. Western Michigan: 30. Buffalo: 34. Bowling Green: 57. Kent State: 67. Ball State: 44

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 7 by 11.3. Idaho: 15 by 65.7. Marshall: 10 by 71.9. SE Louisiana: 4 by 54.7. Minnesota: 16 by 52.1. Akron: 11 by 9.5. Miami (OH): 13 by 35.3. Western Michigan: 9 by 33.5. Buffalo: 14 by 26. Bowling Green: 11 by 54. Kent State: 10 by 70.3. Ball State: 4 by 95.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins50.6 · Games = 7 · +8.4 vs Losses
Losses42.2 · Games = 5 · -8.4 vs Wins