Usage Score
17.5
Player Dossier
2012-2015Ohio
RB • 5'7" • Plant City, FL, USA
Daz'mond Patterson leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.3 efficiency.
Usage Score
17.5
Efficiency
48.3
Consistency
68.9
Season Value
58.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Daz'mond Patterson, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Ohio. Daz'mond Patterson leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.3 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Ohio paired 565 primary output with 48.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 48.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Idaho
Win with 91 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
47.1
Efficiency
48.3
Usage
17.5
Consistency
68.9
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 19. Idaho: 91. Marshall: 69. Unknown: 21. Minnesota: 71. Akron: 14. Miami (OH): 48. Western Michigan: 30. Buffalo: 34. Bowling Green: 57. Kent State: 67. Ball State: 44
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 7 by 11.3. Idaho: 15 by 65.7. Marshall: 10 by 71.9. Unknown: 4 by 54.7. Minnesota: 16 by 52.1. Akron: 11 by 9.5. Miami (OH): 13 by 35.3. Western Michigan: 9 by 33.5. Buffalo: 14 by 26. Bowling Green: 11 by 54. Kent State: 10 by 70.3. Ball State: 4 by 95.8
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Idaho
Best efficiency game
95.8 vs Ball State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/19 | @ App State | L 29-31 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 2.7 |
| Wed 11/18 | vs Ball State | W 48-31 | 4 | 44 | 11 | 1 | — | — | 11 |
| Wed 11/11 | vs Kent State | W 27-0 | 9 | 61 | 6.80 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6.7 |
| Thu 11/5 | @ Bowling Green | L 24-62 | 11 | 57 | 5.20 | 1 | — | — | 5.2 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Buffalo | L 17-41 | 11 | 28 | 2.50 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 2.4 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Western Michigan | L 14-49 | 7 | 22 | 3.10 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 3.3 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Miami (OH) | W 34-3 | 11 | 35 | 3.20 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 3.7 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Akron | W 14-12 | 9 | 6 | 0.70 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 1.3 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Minnesota | L 24-27 | 13 | 70 | 5.40 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4.4 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 21 | 5.30 | 1 | — | — | 5.3 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Marshall | W 21-10 | 10 | 69 | 6.90 | 1 | — | — | 6.9 |
| Fri 9/4 | @ Idaho | W 45-28 | 13 | 84 | 6.50 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6.1 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Ohio | 293 | 59.7 | 5 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio | 293 | 59.7 | 5 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Ohio | 331 | 52.2 | 8.3 | 38 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio | 331 | 52.2 | 8.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio | 464 | 47 | 16.5 | 133 |
| 2015 Postseason | Ohio | 565 | 48.3 | 17.5 | 101 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio | 565 | 48.3 | 17.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 104 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
104
Primary metric
104 scrimmage yards and 12.9 usage.
#2
Ball State
95
Primary metric
Loss with 95 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
95 scrimmage yards and 9.4 usage.
#3
Idaho
91
Primary metric
Win with 91 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
91 scrimmage yards and 25.9 usage.
#4
Central Michigan
77
Primary metric
Loss with 77 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
77 scrimmage yards and 40 usage.
#5
Kent State
109
Primary metric
Win with 109 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
109 scrimmage yards and 31.7 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Ohio
565 primary output · 48.3 efficiency · 17.5 usage
58.7
#2
2015 Regular Season · Ohio
58.7
565 primary · 48.3 efficiency · 17.5 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Ohio
47.9
464 primary · 47 efficiency · 16.5 usage
3
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7814
Plant City · Plant City, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,653
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Daz'mond Patterson quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit