Usage Score
5.1
Player Dossier
2012-2016Ohio
DL • 6'4" • Mentor, OH, USA
Kurt Laseak shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.1
Efficiency
20.9
Consistency
66.8
Season Value
32.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kurt Laseak, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio. Kurt Laseak shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.9 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Ohio paired 10.5 primary output with 20.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 20.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
20.9
Usage
5.1
Consistency
66.8
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 1. Texas State: 2. Kansas: 1. Miami (OH): 2. Bowling Green: 1. Eastern Michigan: 0. Kent State: 0. Toledo: 1. Buffalo: 1. Central Michigan: 0. Western Michigan: 1.5
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 3 by 22.5. Texas State: 5 by 40.8. Kansas: 2 by 18.3. Miami (OH): 3 by 32.5. Bowling Green: 3 by 22.5. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Kent State: 1 by 4.2. Toledo: 2 by 18.3. Buffalo: 2 by 18.3. Central Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Western Michigan: 6 by 40
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas State
Best efficiency game
40.8 vs Texas State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/24 | @ Troy | L 23-28 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Western Michigan | L 23-29 | 6 | 1 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/16 | @ Central Michigan | L 20-27 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/3 | vs Buffalo | W 34-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/27 | @ Toledo | W 31-26 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Kent State | W 14-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 20-27 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Bowling Green | W 30-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Miami (OH) | W 17-7 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Kansas | W 37-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Texas State | L 54-56 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio | 10.5 | 20.9 | 5.1 | 10.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio | 10.5 | 20.9 | 5.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas State
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.5 takeover score.
#2
Miami (OH)
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.1 takeover score.
#3
Western Michigan
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 41.9 takeover score.
#4
Bowling Green
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 26.4 takeover score.
#5
Toledo
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 26 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Ohio
10.5 primary output · 20.9 efficiency · 5.1 usage
32.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · Ohio
32.6
10.5 primary · 20.9 efficiency · 5.1 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Ohio
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7917
Mentor · Mentor, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
30
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Kurt Laseak quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit