Usage / Role
47%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2012-2016Pittsburgh
QB • 6'2" • Fruit Cove, FL, USA
Nathan Peterman is a balanced quarterback profile with 13.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
47%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
49
Developing production for a quarterback
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
49
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Player Story
Nathan Peterman built his college career from 2012 through 2016 as a quarterback from Fruit Cove, FL wearing No. 4, spending time with Pittsburgh and Tennessee. The clearest part of Nathan Peterman's career was his...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Nathan Peterman, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Nathan Peterman is a balanced quarterback profile with 13.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tennessee | 3 | 39 | 45 | -6 | 0 | 31.1 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tennessee | 6 | 62 | 49 | 13 | 1 | 21.9 |
| 2015 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 13 | 162 | 137 | 25 | 1 | 66.2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 13 | 2,358 | 2,150 | 208 | 20 | 66.2 |
| 2016 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 13 | 248 | 253 | -5 | 2 | 68.4 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 13 | 2,893 | 2,602 | 291 | 28 | 68.4 |
Related Context
Nathan Peterman played QB for Tennessee and Pittsburgh. Across 5 tracked seasons, Nathan Peterman recorded 5,236 passing yards, 526 rushing yards, and 9 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 3,141 primary output with 65.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 65.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tennessee, Pittsburgh.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
241.6
Efficiency
65.9
Usage
13.4
Consistency
77.9
Best Game by takeover score
Syracuse
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 248. Villanova: 167. Penn State: 143. Oklahoma State: 270. North Carolina: 159. Marshall: 298. Georgia Tech: 185. Virginia: 163. Virginia Tech: 300. Miami: 312. Clemson: 326. Duke: 240. Syracuse: 330
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 21 by 62.5. Villanova: 35 by 51.2. Penn State: 23 by 65.6. Oklahoma State: 38 by 59.8. North Carolina: 24 by 68.6. Marshall: 28 by 77.5. Georgia Tech: 24 by 62.5. Virginia: 26 by 64.7. Virginia Tech: 27 by 76.7. Miami: 43 by 59.2. Clemson: 43 by 64.7. Duke: 22 by 61.6. Syracuse: 24 by 81.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
81.9 vs Syracuse
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | @ Northwestern | L 24-31 | 13 | 18 | 253 | 72.2 | 1 | 1 | 62.5 | 3 | -5 | -1.70 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Syracuse3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 76-61 | 9 | 18 | 251 | 50.0 | 4 | 1 | 81.9 | 6 | 79 | 13.20 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Duke3+ TD | W 56-14 | 11 | 18 | 237 | 61.1 | 3 | 1 | 61.6 | 4 | 3 | 0.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Clemson300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 43-42 | 22 | 37 | 308 | 59.5 | 5 | 0 | 64.7 | 6 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Miami | L 28-51 | 17 | 35 | 287 | 48.6 | 2 | 1 | 59.2 | 8 | 25 | 3.10 | 0 | 20 |
| Thu 10/27 | vs Virginia Tech | L 36-39 | 13 | 22 | 267 | 59.1 | 1 | 1 | 76.7 | 5 | 33 | 6.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Virginia | W 45-31 | 11 | 21 | 137 | 52.4 | 2 | 0 | 64.7 | 5 | 26 | 5.20 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Georgia Tech | W 37-34 | 14 | 20 | 192 | 70.0 | 1 | 0 | 62.5 | 4 | -7 | -1.80 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Marshall | W 43-27 | 17 | 23 | 280 | 73.9 | 2 | 0 | 77.5 | 5 | 18 | 3.60 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ North Carolina | L 36-37 | 14 | 18 | 140 | 77.8 | 0 | 0 | 68.6 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Oklahoma State | L 38-45 | 14 | 29 | 237 | 48.3 | 1 | 1 | 59.8 | 9 | 33 | 3.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Penn State3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 42-39 | 11 | 15 | 91 | 73.3 | 3 | 1 | 65.6 | 8 | 52 | 6.50 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Villanova | W 28-7 | 19 | 32 | 175 | 59.4 | 2 | 0 | 51.2 | 3 | -8 | -2.70 | 0 | 6 |
Player Story
Nathan Peterman built his college career from 2012 through 2016 as a quarterback from Fruit Cove, FL wearing No. 4, spending time with Pittsburgh and Tennessee. The clearest part of Nathan Peterman's career was his passing role: 5,236 passing yards, 47 touchdown passes, 663 attempts, and 526 rushing yards across 35 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with Pittsburgh. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Quarterback careers are usually judged first by volume, efficiency, and scoring chances. His career also includes 526 rushing yards, 9 receiving yards, and 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 35 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Pittsburgh and Tennessee.
The arc is straightforward: Nathan Peterman moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2012-2014
Opening stop
Pittsburgh
2015-2016
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tennessee | 39 | 40 | 9.4 | 39 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tennessee | 62 | 48.2 | 6 | 23 |
| 2015 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 2,520 | 60.6 | 19.2 | 2,458 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 2,520 | 60.6 | 19.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 3,141 | 65.9 | 13.4 | 621 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 3,141 | 65.9 | 13.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs North Carolina
Week 9 · L 19-26 · Conference game
Loss with 303 yards of offense and 62.6 efficiency.
303
Total Offense
78.2 takeover
303 total offense with 62.6 efficiency.
#2
vs Notre Dame
Week 10 · L 30-42
283
Total Offense
72 takeover
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
283 total offense with 65.2 efficiency.
#3
vs Syracuse
Week 13 · W 76-61 · Conference game
330
Total Offense
71.7 takeover
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
330 total offense with 81.9 efficiency.
#4
@ Miami
Week 10 · L 28-51 · Conference game
312
Total Offense
68.6 takeover
Loss with 312 yards of offense and 59.2 efficiency.
312 total offense with 59.2 efficiency.
#5
@ Clemson
Week 11 · W 43-42 · Conference game
326
Total Offense
68 takeover
Win with 326 yards of offense and 64.7 efficiency.
326 total offense with 64.7 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
3,141 primary output · 65.9 efficiency · 13.4 usage
68.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
68.4
3,141 primary · 65.9 efficiency · 13.4 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Pittsburgh
66.2
2,520 primary · 60.6 efficiency · 19.2 usage
7
250+ passing yards
5
300+ total offense
7
3+ TD games
21
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.