Player Stats

Adam Butler College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
31
TFL
7.5
Sacks
4
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonVanderbilt00-0--0-
2013 Regular SeasonVanderbilt00-0--0-
2014 Regular SeasonVanderbilt00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonVanderbilt00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonVanderbilt137-0--059.7
2016 Regular SeasonVanderbilt13247.5421059.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Vanderbilt paired 14.5 primary output with 21.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 21.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida

Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Vanderbilt

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.1

Efficiency

21.1

Usage

7.8

Consistency

53.1

Best Game by takeover score

Florida

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. NC State: 0. South Carolina: 1. Middle Tennessee: 1. Georgia Tech: 1. Western Kentucky: 1. Florida: 4. Kentucky: 1. Georgia: 0. Tennessee State: 0.5. Auburn: 1. Missouri: 0. Ole Miss: 1. Tennessee: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. NC State: 7 by 29.2. South Carolina: 1 by 14.2. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 14.2. Georgia Tech: 3 by 22.5. Western Kentucky: 1 by 14.2. Florida: 5 by 60.8. Kentucky: 1 by 14.2. Georgia: 1 by 4.2. Tennessee State: 1 by 9.2. Auburn: 2 by 18.3. Missouri: 3 by 12.5. Ole Miss: 2 by 18.3. Tennessee: 3 by 42.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.1 · Games = 6 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · Games = 7 · +0.1 vs Wins