Usage Score
28
Player Dossier
2013-2016Buffalo
TE • 6'5" • Medina, OH, USA
Mason Schreck reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
28
Efficiency
73.7
Consistency
69.7
Season Value
67.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Buffalo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mason Schreck, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Buffalo. Mason Schreck reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Mason Schreck played TE for Buffalo. Across 4 tracked seasons, Mason Schreck recorded 23 passing yards, 1,113 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Buffalo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 651 primary output with 73.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
54.3
Efficiency
73.7
Usage
28
Consistency
69.7
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 58. Nevada: 31. Army: 58. Boston College: 26. Kent State: 21. Ball State: 61. Northern Illinois: 43. Akron: 52. Ohio: 120. Miami (OH): 89. Western Michigan: 57. Bowling Green: 35
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 5 by 77.3. Nevada: 1 by 100. Army: 5 by 77.3. Boston College: 2 by 86.7. Kent State: 3 by 46.7. Ball State: 9 by 45.2. Northern Illinois: 5 by 57.3. Akron: 3 by 100. Ohio: 7 by 100. Miami (OH): 10 by 59.3. Western Michigan: 5 by 76. Bowling Green: 4 by 58.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | @ Bowling Green | L 19-27 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Western Michigan | L 0-38 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Miami (OH)High volume | L 24-35 | — | 10 | 89 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 0 | 13 |
| Thu 11/3 | @ Ohio100 receiving yards | L 10-34 | — | 7 | 120 | 17.1 | 17.10 | 1 | 75 |
| Thu 10/27 | vs Akron | W 41-20 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Northern Illinois | L 7-44 | — | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Ball StateHigh volume | L 21-31 | — | 9 | 61 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Kent State | L 20-44 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Boston College | L 3-35 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Army | W 23-20 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Nevada | L 14-38 | — | 1 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 31 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 1 | 17 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Buffalo
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Buffalo | 147 | 56.1 | 9.7 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Buffalo | 147 | 56.1 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Buffalo | 106 | 64.6 | 7.9 | -41 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 209 | 56.5 | 10.3 | 103 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Buffalo | 651 | 73.7 | 28 | 442 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
120
Primary metric
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
27
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
62
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 82.7 efficiency score.
#4
UConn
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Bowling Green
25
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Buffalo
651 primary output · 73.7 efficiency · 28 usage
67.6
#2
2014 Regular Season · Buffalo
41
106 primary · 64.6 efficiency · 7.9 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Buffalo
37.7
209 primary · 56.5 efficiency · 10.3 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7733
Medina · Medina, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,113
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.