Usage Score
23.4
Player Dossier
2012-2016Buffalo
WR • 6'1" • Rochester, NY, USA
Marcus McGill reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
23.4
Efficiency
74
Consistency
51.9
Season Value
61.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Buffalo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marcus McGill, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Buffalo. Marcus McGill reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Marcus McGill played WR for Buffalo. Across 5 tracked seasons, Marcus McGill recorded 26 passing yards, 10 rushing yards, and 1,497 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Buffalo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 581 primary output with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
52.1
Efficiency
74
Usage
23.4
Consistency
51.9
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 32. Army: 63. Boston College: 23. Kent State: 65. Ball State: 28. Northern Illinois: 12. Akron: 82. Ohio: 40. Miami (OH): 34. Western Michigan: 52. Bowling Green: 142
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 71.1. Army: 2 by 100. Boston College: 5 by 30.7. Kent State: 4 by 100. Ball State: 3 by 62.2. Northern Illinois: 2 by 40. Akron: 3 by 100. Ohio: 4 by 66.7. Miami (OH): 4 by 56.7. Western Michigan: 4 by 86.7. Bowling Green: 6 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | @ Bowling Green100 receiving yards | L 19-27 | — | 6 | 142 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 0 | 52 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Western Michigan | L 0-38 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Miami (OH) | L 24-35 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 11/3 | @ Ohio | L 10-34 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 16 |
| Thu 10/27 | vs Akron | W 41-20 | — | 3 | 82 | 27.3 | 27.30 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Northern Illinois | L 7-44 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Ball State | L 21-31 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Kent State | L 20-44 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Boston College | L 3-35 | — | 5 | 23 | 4.6 | 4.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Army | W 23-20 | — | 2 | 63 | 31.5 | 31.50 | 0 | 49 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Buffalo
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Buffalo | 343 | 88 | 14.3 | 343 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 581 | 73.8 | 18.8 | 238 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Buffalo | 573 | 74 | 23.4 | -8 |
#1 Featured game
Bowling Green
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
142
Primary metric
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Army
128
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Massachusetts
78
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 67.5 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Buffalo
581 primary output · 73.8 efficiency · 18.8 usage
64.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · Buffalo
61.4
573 primary · 74 efficiency · 23.4 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Buffalo
53.3
343 primary · 88 efficiency · 14.3 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8144
Gates-Chili · Rochester, NY
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,497
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.