Usage Score
20.8
Player Dossier
2012-2015Akron
Andrew Pratt
WR • 6'5" • Green, OH, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Andrew Pratt reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
61.3
Consistency
52
Season Value
55.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Akron
1213141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Akron
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Pratt, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Akron. Andrew Pratt reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Akron paired 324 primary output with 74.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 61.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Akron
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
31.1
Efficiency
61.3
Usage
20.8
Consistency
52
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 94. Louisiana: 14. Ohio: 40. Bowling Green: 17. Central Michigan: 25. Massachusetts: 12. Miami (OH): 34. Buffalo: 7. Kent State: 37
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 9 by 69.6. Louisiana: 2 by 46.7. Ohio: 3 by 88.9. Bowling Green: 2 by 56.7. Central Michigan: 4 by 41.7. Massachusetts: 2 by 40. Miami (OH): 1 by 100. Buffalo: 1 by 46.7. Kent State: 4 by 61.7
Split Comparison
Wins33 · n=6 · +5.7 vs Losses
Losses27.3 · n=3 · -5.7 vs Wins
First Half38 · n=5 · +15.5 vs Second Half
Second Half22.5 · n=4 · -15.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/22 | @ Utah StateHigh volume | W 23-21 | — | 9 | 94 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 24 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Kent State | W 20-0 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Buffalo | W 42-21 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Miami (OH) | W 37-28 | — | 1 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Massachusetts | W 17-13 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Central Michigan | L 6-14 | — | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Bowling Green | L 10-59 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Ohio | L 12-14 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Louisiana | W 35-14 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Akron
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Akron | 156 | 72 | 5.8 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Akron | 188 | 71.1 | 7.7 | 32 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Akron | 324 | 74.9 | 13.9 | 136 |
| 2015 Postseason | Akron | 280 | 61.3 | 20.8 | -44 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Akron | 280 | 61.3 | 20.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94
Primary metric
94 receiving yards with a 69.6 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
118
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Bowling Green
85
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 94.4 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
90
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Akron
324 primary output · 74.9 efficiency · 13.9 usage
63
#2
2015 Postseason · Akron
55.1
280 primary · 61.3 efficiency · 20.8 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Akron
55.1
280 primary · 61.3 efficiency · 20.8 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7333
Green · Hinckley, OH
- Committed To
- Akron
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
948
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.