Player Stats

Conor Hundley College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,355
Rushing yards
2,155
Receiving yards
200
Touchdowns
19

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonAkron1133827959339.9
2013 Regular SeasonAkron1244142516051.5
2014 Regular SeasonAkron1159554055655.7
2015 PostseasonAkron1328280075.3
2015 Regular SeasonAkron13953883701075.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Akron paired 981 primary output with 46.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 46.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Savannah St

Win with 157 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Akron

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

75.5

Efficiency

46.4

Usage

29.6

Consistency

70.2

Best Game by takeover score

Savannah St

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 28. Oklahoma: 36. Pittsburgh: 54. Savannah St: 157. Louisiana: 105. Ohio: 66. Eastern Michigan: 118. Bowling Green: 77. Central Michigan: 34. Massachusetts: 92. Miami (OH): 92. Buffalo: 24. Kent State: 98

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 14 by 20.8. Oklahoma: 8 by 46.9. Pittsburgh: 11 by 51.1. Savannah St: 15 by 93.6. Louisiana: 20 by 45.6. Ohio: 18 by 38.2. Eastern Michigan: 18 by 71.1. Bowling Green: 18 by 44.8. Central Michigan: 12 by 29.5. Massachusetts: 23 by 41.7. Miami (OH): 21 by 45.6. Buffalo: 9 by 27.8. Kent State: 22 by 46.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins89.3 · Games = 8 · +35.9 vs Losses
Losses53.4 · Games = 5 · -35.9 vs Wins