Usage Score
6
Player Dossier
2012-2016North Texas
DE • 6'4" • Cedar Hill, TX, USA
Malik Dilonga shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 13.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
6
Efficiency
13.9
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
16.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Malik Dilonga, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · North Texas. Malik Dilonga shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 13.9 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
North Texas paired 6.5 primary output with 13.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 13.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
13.9
Usage
6
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 0. SMU: 0. Unknown: 0. Rice: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0. Marshall: 0.5. UTSA: 0. Louisiana Tech: 2. Western Kentucky: 0.5. Southern Miss: 3.5. UTEP: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 2 by 8.3. SMU: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. Rice: 1 by 4.2. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. Marshall: 2 by 13.3. UTSA: 2 by 8.3. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 24.2. Western Kentucky: 3 by 17.5. Southern Miss: 3 by 47.5. UTEP: 3 by 12.5
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
47.5 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | vs Army | L 31-38 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ UTEP | L 24-52 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Southern MissSplash game | W 29-23 | 3 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Western Kentucky | L 7-45 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 24-45 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ UTSA | L 17-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Marshall | W 38-21 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 13-30 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Rice | W 42-35 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs SMU | L 21-34 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | North Texas | 6.5 | 13.9 | 6 | 6.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | North Texas | 6.5 | 13.9 | 6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.5 takeover score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.5 takeover score.
#3
Western Kentucky
0.5
Primary metric
Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 12.7 takeover score.
#4
Marshall
0.5
Primary metric
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 10.4 takeover score.
#5
UTEP
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 4.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · North Texas
6.5 primary output · 13.9 efficiency · 6 usage
16.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · North Texas
16.1
6.5 primary · 13.9 efficiency · 6 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · North Texas
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8006
Trinity Christian School · Cedar Hill, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
21
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Malik Dilonga quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit