Usage Score
11.6
Player Dossier
2012-2016Kent State
Brice Fackler
TE • 6'4" • Kenton, OH, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Brice Fackler reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67.4
Consistency
37.3
Season Value
53.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Kent State
1213141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Kent State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brice Fackler, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Kent State. Brice Fackler reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Brice Fackler played TE for Kent State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Brice Fackler recorded 34 rushing yards, 257 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Kent State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Kent State paired 185 primary output with 67.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Kent State
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
18.5
Efficiency
67.4
Usage
11.6
Consistency
37.3
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 7. Unknown: 58. Unknown: 4. Akron: 4. Buffalo: 0. Miami (OH): 7. Ohio: 31. Central Michigan: 15. Western Michigan: 18. Northern Illinois: 41
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 1 by 46.7. Unknown: 3 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 26.7. Akron: 1 by 26.7. Miami (OH): 1 by 46.7. Ohio: 1 by 100. Central Michigan: 1 by 100. Western Michigan: 2 by 60. Northern Illinois: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins7.5 · Games = 2 · -10.5 vs Losses
Losses18 · Games = 6 · +10.5 vs Wins
First Half14.6 · Games = 5 · -7.8 vs Second Half
Second Half22.4 · Games = 5 · +7.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | vs Northern Illinois | L 21-31 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 1 | 31 |
| Wed 11/9 | vs Western Michigan | L 21-37 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Central Michigan | W 27-24 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Ohio | L 10-14 | — | 1 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Miami (OH) | L 14-18 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Buffalo | W 44-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Akron | L 27-31 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 2 | 27 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Penn State | L 13-33 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kent State
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kent State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kent State | 72 | 41.6 | 10.1 | 72 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kent State | 185 | 67.4 | 11.6 | 113 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
58
Primary metric
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 64.4 efficiency score.
#4
Ohio
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Marshall
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Kent State
185 primary output · 67.4 efficiency · 11.6 usage
53.3
#2
2013 Regular Season · Kent State
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Kent State
30.6
72 primary · 41.6 efficiency · 10.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7483
Kenton · Kenton, OH
- Committed To
- Kent State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
257
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.