Player Stats

James Knapke College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
4,153
Passing yards
4,053
Rushing yards
100
Touchdowns
22

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonBowling Green00000-
2013 Regular SeasonBowling Green47071-1115.2
2014 PostseasonBowling Green1339236824264
2014 Regular SeasonBowling Green132,9172,8051121564
2015 Regular SeasonBowling Green61771734133.9
2016 Regular SeasonBowling Green6597636-39330.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

Bowling Green paired 3,309 primary output with 58.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 32.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Dakota

Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green

Games

6

Primary Metric / G

99.5

Efficiency

32.9

Usage

8.6

Consistency

50.5

Best Game by takeover score

North Dakota

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 87. North Dakota: 308. Middle Tennessee: 132. Memphis: 82. Eastern Michigan: 0. Buffalo: -12

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 35 by 35. North Dakota: 46 by 50.8. Middle Tennessee: 37 by 42.7. Memphis: 13 by 35.5. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 33.3. Buffalo: 1 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins148 · Games = 2 · +72.8 vs Losses
Losses75.3 · Games = 4 · -72.8 vs Wins