Usage Score
18.9
Player Dossier
2012-2016UCF
Taylor Oldham
WR • 6'2" • Daytona Beach, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Taylor Oldham reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.2
Consistency
64.2
Season Value
63.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UCF
121314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- UCF
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Taylor Oldham, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UCF. Taylor Oldham reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Taylor Oldham played WR for UCF. Across 5 tracked seasons, Taylor Oldham recorded 443 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with UCF.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
UCF paired 366 primary output with 69.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · UCF
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
33.3
Efficiency
69.2
Usage
18.9
Consistency
64.2
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 56. Michigan: 29. Maryland: 33. Florida International: 37. East Carolina: 25. Temple: 37. UConn: 72. Houston: 17. Cincinnati: 17. Tulsa: 20. South Florida: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 5 by 74.7. Michigan: 3 by 64.4. Maryland: 5 by 44. Florida International: 1 by 100. East Carolina: 1 by 100. Temple: 5 by 49.3. UConn: 4 by 100. Houston: 1 by 100. Cincinnati: 2 by 56.7. Tulsa: 4 by 33.3. South Florida: 4 by 38.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins37.8 · Games = 4 · +7.0 vs Losses
Losses30.7 · Games = 7 · -7.0 vs Wins
First Half36.2 · Games = 6 · +6.4 vs Second Half
Second Half29.8 · Games = 5 · -6.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UConn
Best efficiency game
100 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs Arkansas State | L 13-31 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ South Florida | L 31-48 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Tulsa | L 20-35 | — | 4 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Cincinnati | W 24-3 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Houston | L 24-31 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ UConn | W 24-16 | — | 4 | 72 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Temple | L 25-26 | — | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ East Carolina | W 47-29 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Florida International | W 53-14 | — | 1 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Maryland | L 24-30 | — | 5 | 33 | 6.6 | 6.60 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Michigan | L 14-51 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UCF
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UCF | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UCF | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UCF | 35 | 68.9 | 7.5 | 35 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UCF | 42 | 36.4 | 8.5 | 7 |
| 2016 Postseason | UCF | 366 | 69.2 | 18.9 | 324 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UCF | 366 | 69.2 | 18.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72
Primary metric
72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
14
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas State
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 74.7 efficiency score.
#5
UConn
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 48.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · UCF
366 primary output · 69.2 efficiency · 18.9 usage
63.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · UCF
63.1
366 primary · 69.2 efficiency · 18.9 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · UCF
39
35 primary · 68.9 efficiency · 7.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7583
Warner Christian Academy · Daytona Beach, FL
- Committed To
- UCF
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
443
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.