Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Middle Tennessee paired 2,999 primary output with 62.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Austin Grammer College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Total offense
- 3,473
- Passing yards
- 2,792
- Rushing yards
- 681
- Touchdowns
- 28
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2013 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 8 | 359 | 190 | 169 | 3 | 33.5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 12 | 2,999 | 2,557 | 442 | 23 | 74.9 |
| 2015 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.5 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 10 | 115 | 45 | 70 | 2 | 25.5 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 44 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with 37 yards of offense and 75.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
11.5
Efficiency
44
Usage
7.2
Consistency
38.4
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 0. Jackson State: 29. Alabama: 20. Charlotte: 14. Western Kentucky: 0. Florida International: 1. Louisiana Tech: 0. Marshall: 0. North Texas: 37. UTSA: 14
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Jackson State: 6 by 63.8. Alabama: 3 by 81.3. Charlotte: 3 by 57.9. Florida International: 1 by 10. Marshall: 1 by 0. North Texas: 6 by 75.2. UTSA: 7 by 20
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins15.8 · Games = 6 · +10.8 vs Losses
Losses5 · Games = 4 · -10.8 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Austin Grammer
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.