Usage Score
3.5
Player Dossier
2012-2016UTEP
Brian Madunezim
DL • 6'3" • Houston, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Brian Madunezim shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 13.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
13.6
Consistency
6.1
Season Value
7.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
1213141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Old Dominion
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brian Madunezim, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP. Brian Madunezim shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 13.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTEP paired 2 primary output with 13.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 13.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Old Dominion
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
13.6
Usage
3.5
Consistency
6.1
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 0. Texas: 0. Army: 0. Southern Miss: 1. Louisiana Tech: 0. Florida International: 0. UTSA: 0. Old Dominion: 1. Florida Atlantic: 0. Rice: 0. North Texas: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 3 by 12.5. Army: 7 by 29.2. Southern Miss: 3 by 22.5. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 20.8. Florida International: 5 by 20.8. UTSA: 1 by 4.2. Old Dominion: 3 by 22.5. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 4.2. Rice: 1 by 4.2. North Texas: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 3 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 8 · +0.3 vs Wins
First Half0.2 · Games = 6 · -0.0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · Games = 5 · +0.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Old Dominion
Best efficiency game
29.2 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs North Texas | W 52-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | L 24-44 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 31-35 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Old Dominion | L 21-31 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ UTSA | W 52-49 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Florida International | L 21-35 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 7-28 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Southern Miss | L 7-34 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Army | L 14-66 | 7 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Texas | L 7-41 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | vs New Mexico State | W 38-22 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 2 | 13.6 | 3.5 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Old Dominion
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#2
Southern Miss
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.3 takeover score.
#3
Army
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 10.8 takeover score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 8.3 takeover score.
#5
Florida International
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 7.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
2 primary output · 13.6 efficiency · 3.5 usage
7.4
#2
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7333
Aldine Nimitz · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
31
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.