Usage Score
1.3
Player Dossier
2012-2016UTEP
Christian Harper
DL • 6'4" • Houston, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Christian Harper shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
9.7
Consistency
100
Season Value
37
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
1213141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Christian Harper, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP. Christian Harper shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTEP paired 0 primary output with 9.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 9.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
3
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
9.7
Usage
1.3
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 0. Southern Miss: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 4 by 16.7. Southern Miss: 2 by 8.3. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Losses0 · n=3
First Half0 · n=2
All Games0 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
16.7 vs Army
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 9.7 | 1.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Primary metric
0 disruption/tackle impact with 6.2 takeover score.
#2
Southern Miss
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.2 takeover score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
0 primary output · 9.7 efficiency · 1.3 usage
37
#2
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7785
North Shore · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
7
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 3 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.