Usage Score
18.5
Player Dossier
2012-2016UTEP
Cole Freytag
WR • 6'1" • El Paso, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Cole Freytag reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.6
Consistency
60
Season Value
65.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
1213141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cole Freytag, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP. Cole Freytag reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTEP paired 520 primary output with 86.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 86.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
43.3
Efficiency
86.6
Usage
18.5
Consistency
60
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 95. Texas: 12. Army: 22. Southern Miss: 33. Louisiana Tech: 45. Florida International: 68. UTSA: 19. Old Dominion: 84. Unknown: 18. Florida Atlantic: 53. Rice: 26. North Texas: 45
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 4 by 100. Texas: 2 by 40. Army: 1 by 100. Southern Miss: 1 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 100. Florida International: 5 by 90.7. UTSA: 1 by 100. Old Dominion: 7 by 80. Unknown: 1 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 70.7. Rice: 3 by 57.8. North Texas: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins53 · n=3 · +10.1 vs Losses
Losses42.9 · n=8 · -10.1 vs Wins
First Half45.8 · n=6 · +5 vs Second Half
Second Half40.8 · n=6 · -5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs North Texas | W 52-24 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | L 24-44 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 31-35 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 18 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Old Dominion | L 21-31 | — | 7 | 84 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ UTSA | W 52-49 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Florida International | L 21-35 | — | 5 | 68 | 12 | 13.60 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 7-28 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Southern Miss | L 7-34 | — | 1 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Army | L 14-66 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Texas | L 7-41 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs New Mexico State | W 38-22 | — | 4 | 95 | 23.8 | 23.80 | 1 | 46 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 11 | 73.3 | 10 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | -11 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 257 | 82.4 | 13.6 | 257 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 520 | 86.6 | 18.5 | 263 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
New Mexico State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95
Primary metric
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida International
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Old Dominion
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Florida International
68
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 90.7 efficiency score.
#5
Rice
11
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
520 primary output · 86.6 efficiency · 18.5 usage
65.8
#2
2015 Regular Season · UTEP
51.7
257 primary · 82.4 efficiency · 13.6 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
46.3
11 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 10 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7333
Coronado · El Paso, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
788
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.