Usage Score
4
Player Dossier
2012-2016Central Michigan
Winslow Chapman
DB • 6'0" • Port Huron, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Winslow Chapman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
16.6
Consistency
6.1
Season Value
7.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Central Michigan
1213141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Winslow Chapman, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Winslow Chapman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 2 primary output with 16.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 16.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Central Michigan
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
16.6
Usage
4
Consistency
6.1
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 1. Oklahoma State: 1. UNLV: 0. Virginia: 0. Western Michigan: 0. Ball State: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Toledo: 0. Kent State: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Ohio: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 26.7. Oklahoma State: 6 by 35. Virginia: 8 by 33.3. Western Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Ball State: 3 by 12.5. Northern Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Toledo: 6 by 25. Kent State: 4 by 16.7. Miami (OH): 2 by 8.3. Ohio: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.2 · Games = 5 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs Wins
First Half0.3 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
35 vs Oklahoma State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/16 | vs Ohio | W 27-20 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/4 | @ Miami (OH) | L 17-37 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Kent State | L 24-27 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Toledo | L 17-31 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Northern Illinois | W 34-28 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Ball State | W 24-21 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Western Michigan | L 10-49 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Virginia | L 35-49 | 8 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs UNLV | W 44-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Oklahoma State | W 30-27 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 2 | 16.6 | 4 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.6 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#3
Virginia
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 15.7 takeover score.
#4
Toledo
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 9.8 takeover score.
#5
Kent State
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 6.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Central Michigan
2 primary output · 16.6 efficiency · 4 usage
7.9
#2
2012 Regular Season · Central Michigan
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Central Michigan
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7433
Port Huron · Port Huron, MI
- Committed To
- Central Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
39
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.