Usage Score
4.4
Player Dossier
2012-2016Central Michigan
Tony Annese
DB • 6'1" • Hartland, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Tony Annese shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
26.1
Consistency
13.3
Season Value
13.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Central Michigan
121314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tony Annese, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Tony Annese shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 2 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 26.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Central Michigan
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
26.1
Usage
4.4
Consistency
13.3
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 0. Unknown: 0. Oklahoma State: 1. UNLV: 1. Northern Illinois: 0. Toledo: 1. Kent State: 1. Miami (OH): 0. Ohio: 0. Eastern Michigan: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 9 by 37.5. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Oklahoma State: 1 by 14.2. UNLV: 6 by 35. Northern Illinois: 6 by 25. Toledo: 2 by 18.3. Kent State: 5 by 30.8. Miami (OH): 11 by 45.8. Ohio: 4 by 16.7. Eastern Michigan: 7 by 29.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.5 · n=4 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · n=5 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · n=5 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · n=5 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UNLV
Best efficiency game
45.8 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/19 | @ Tulsa | L 10-55 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/23 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 21-26 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/16 | vs Ohio | W 27-20 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/4 | @ Miami (OH)10+ tackles | L 17-37 | 11 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Kent State | L 24-27 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Toledo | L 17-31 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Northern Illinois | W 34-28 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs UNLV | W 44-21 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Oklahoma State | W 30-27 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 2 | 20 | — | 2 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 3 | 30 | — | 1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 2 | 20 | — | -1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Central Michigan | 4 | 26.1 | 4.4 | 2 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 4 | 26.1 | 4.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#2
Massachusetts
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Western Michigan
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Akron
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Central Michigan
2 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
41.4
#2
2015 Regular Season · Central Michigan
41.4
2 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Central Michigan
36.2
3 primary · 30 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
5
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7783
Adams · Rochester, MI
- Committed To
- Central Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
53
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.