Usage Score
8
Player Dossier
2013-2016Mississippi State
DB • 6'3" • Sheffield, AL, USA
Kivon Coman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
8
Efficiency
31.9
Consistency
35.2
Season Value
22.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Mississippi State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kivon Coman, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Mississippi State. Kivon Coman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.9 disruption score.
Kivon Coman played DB for Mississippi State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kivon Coman recorded 13 receiving yards and 58 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Mississippi State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Mississippi State paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 31.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
31.9
Usage
8
Consistency
35.2
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 0. South Alabama: 2. South Carolina: 0. LSU: 0. Massachusetts: 2. Auburn: 1.5. Texas A&M: 0. Alabama: 1. Arkansas: 0. Ole Miss: 2.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 3 by 12.5. South Alabama: 6 by 45. South Carolina: 4 by 16.7. LSU: 7 by 29.2. Massachusetts: 3 by 32.5. Auburn: 8 by 48.3. Texas A&M: 1 by 4.2. Alabama: 3 by 22.5. Arkansas: 15 by 50. Ole Miss: 8 by 58.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
58.3 vs Ole Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/26 | vs Miami (OH) | W 17-16 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Ole Miss | W 55-20 | 8 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Arkansas10+ tackles | L 42-58 | 15 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Alabama | L 3-51 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Texas A&M | W 35-28 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Auburn | L 14-38 | 8 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Massachusetts | W 47-35 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ LSU | L 20-23 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs South Carolina | W 27-14 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs South AlabamaSplash game | L 20-21 | 6 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Mississippi State
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 1 | 10 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Mississippi State | 9 | 31.9 | 8 | 8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 9 | 31.9 | 8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Missouri
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Ole Miss
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.1 takeover score.
#3
South Alabama
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.4 takeover score.
#4
Auburn
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 42.4 takeover score.
#5
Massachusetts
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 40.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Mississippi State
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2016 Postseason · Mississippi State
22.8
9 primary · 31.9 efficiency · 8 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Mississippi State
22.8
9 primary · 31.9 efficiency · 8 usage
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8358
Florence · Florence, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
58
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.