Usage Score
13.3
Player Dossier
2012-2016Missouri
Sean Culkin
TE • 6'6" • Indian Rocks Beach, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Sean Culkin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.7
Consistency
75.1
Season Value
64.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Missouri
121314141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Missouri
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sean Culkin, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Missouri. Sean Culkin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Sean Culkin played TE for Missouri. Across 5 tracked seasons, Sean Culkin recorded 601 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Missouri.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Missouri paired 282 primary output with 70.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Missouri
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
31.3
Efficiency
70.7
Usage
13.3
Consistency
75.1
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 27. Georgia: 8. LSU: 35. Middle Tennessee: 34. Kentucky: 53. South Carolina: 43. Vanderbilt: 47. Tennessee: 35. Arkansas: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 2 by 90. Georgia: 1 by 53.3. LSU: 4 by 58.3. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 75.6. Kentucky: 6 by 58.9. South Carolina: 2 by 100. Vanderbilt: 3 by 100. Tennessee: 2 by 100. Arkansas: 1 by 0
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins23.5 · Games = 2 · -10.1 vs Losses
Losses33.6 · Games = 7 · +10.1 vs Wins
First Half31.4 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half31.3 · Games = 4 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | vs Arkansas | W 28-24 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Tennessee | L 37-63 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Vanderbilt | W 26-17 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ South Carolina | L 21-31 | — | 2 | 43 | 21.5 | 21.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Kentucky | L 21-35 | — | 6 | 53 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 45-51 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ LSU | L 7-42 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Georgia | L 27-28 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ West Virginia | L 11-26 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Missouri
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Missouri | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Missouri | 6 | 40 | 3.6 | 6 |
| 2014 Postseason | Missouri | 174 | 51.7 | 10.8 | 168 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Missouri | 174 | 51.7 | 10.8 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Missouri | 139 | 56.4 | 14.5 | -35 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Missouri | 282 | 70.7 | 13.3 | 143 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47
Primary metric
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas State
46
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 61.3 efficiency score.
#3
Kentucky
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 58.9 efficiency score.
#4
South Carolina
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
45
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 75 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Missouri
282 primary output · 70.7 efficiency · 13.3 usage
64.7
#2
2014 Postseason · Missouri
46.3
174 primary · 51.7 efficiency · 10.8 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Missouri
46.3
174 primary · 51.7 efficiency · 10.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.868
Indian Rocks Christian School · Largo, FL
- Committed To
- Missouri
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
601
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.