Usage Score
7.2
Player Dossier
2012-2016Mississippi State
Richie Brown
LB • 6'2" • Long Beach, MS, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Richie Brown shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
37.5
Consistency
15.4
Season Value
17
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Mississippi State
121314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Mississippi State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Richie Brown, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Mississippi State. Richie Brown shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Mississippi State paired 3 primary output with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 37.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Mississippi State
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
37.5
Usage
7.2
Consistency
15.4
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 1. South Alabama: 0. South Carolina: 3. LSU: 0.5. Massachusetts: 0. Auburn: 0. BYU: 1. Kentucky: 0. Unknown: 0. Texas A&M: 1. Alabama: 1. Arkansas: 0. Ole Miss: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 9 by 47.5. South Alabama: 6 by 25. South Carolina: 10 by 71.7. LSU: 6 by 30. Massachusetts: 6 by 25. Auburn: 14 by 50. BYU: 9 by 47.5. Kentucky: 4 by 16.7. Unknown: 13 by 50. Texas A&M: 8 by 43.3. Alabama: 6 by 35. Arkansas: 7 by 29.2. Ole Miss: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins1 · n=5 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · n=7 · -0.6 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · n=7 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · n=6 · -0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
71.7 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/26 | vs Miami (OH) | W 17-16 | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Ole Miss | W 55-20 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Arkansas | L 42-58 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Alabama | L 3-51 | 6 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Texas A&M | W 35-28 | 8 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Unknown10+ tackles | — | 13 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Kentucky | L 38-40 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ BYU | L 21-28 | 9 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Auburn10+ tackles | L 14-38 | 14 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Massachusetts | W 47-35 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ LSU | L 20-23 | 6 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs South Carolina10+ tackles · Splash game | W 27-14 | 10 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs South Alabama | L 20-21 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Mississippi State
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 3 | 60 | — | 2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 1 | 20 | — | -2 |
| 2016 Postseason | Mississippi State | 7.5 | 37.5 | 7.2 | 6.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 7.5 | 37.5 | 7.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 80 takeover score.
#2
South Carolina
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 62.8 takeover score.
#3
Ole Miss
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Southern Miss
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
Texas A&M
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 29.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Mississippi State
3 primary output · 60 efficiency · — usage
54.4
#2
2013 Regular Season · Mississippi State
40.4
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Mississippi State
40.4
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
4
Impact games
2
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8893
Long Beach · Long Beach, MS
- Committed To
- Mississippi State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
102
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.