Usage Score
4.2
Player Dossier
2012-2016Louisiana Tech
Lloyd Grogan
S • 6'1" • Morgan City, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Lloyd Grogan shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
27.3
Consistency
11.9
Season Value
13.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
121314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Louisiana Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lloyd Grogan, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech. Lloyd Grogan shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Louisiana Tech paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 27.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
27.3
Usage
4.2
Consistency
11.9
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Navy: 0. Arkansas: 0. Unknown: 2. Texas Tech: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0. UTEP: 1. Western Kentucky: 0.5. Massachusetts: 0. Florida International: 1. Rice: 0. North Texas: 0. UTSA: 2. Southern Miss: 0. Western Kentucky: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 8 by 33.3. Arkansas: 4 by 16.7. Unknown: 4 by 36.7. Texas Tech: 3 by 12.5. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 20.8. UTEP: 7 by 39.2. Western Kentucky: 2 by 13.3. Massachusetts: 8 by 33.3. Florida International: 5 by 30.8. Rice: 3 by 12.5. North Texas: 6 by 25. UTSA: 9 by 57.5. Southern Miss: 6 by 25. Western Kentucky: 6 by 25
Split Comparison
Wins0.6 · n=8 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=5 · -0.6 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · n=7 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · n=7 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
57.5 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/23 | @ Navy | W 48-45 | 8 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Western Kentucky | L 44-58 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Southern Miss | L 24-39 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs UTSA | W 63-35 | 9 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ North Texas | W 45-24 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Rice | W 61-16 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Florida International | W 44-24 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Massachusetts | W 56-28 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/7 | vs Western Kentucky | W 55-52 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs UTEP | W 28-7 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 34-38 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Texas Tech | L 45-59 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Arkansas | L 20-21 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisiana Tech
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 6.5 | 27.3 | 4.2 | 5.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 6.5 | 27.3 | 4.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
UTSA
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.5 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.4 takeover score.
#4
UTEP
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 31.2 takeover score.
#5
Florida International
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 28.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.5
#2
2016 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
13.2
6.5 primary · 27.3 efficiency · 4.2 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
13.2
6.5 primary · 27.3 efficiency · 4.2 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.85
Central Catholic · Morgan City, LA
- Committed To
- Louisiana Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
76
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.