Usage Score
3.5
Player Dossier
2012-2016UTSA
S • 6'3" • Atlanta, GA, USA
Jordan Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
3.5
Efficiency
20.8
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
10.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · TCU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Moore, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · TCU. Jordan Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.8 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
TCU paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 20.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across TCU, UTSA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
20.8
Usage
3.5
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 0. Unknown: 0. Colorado State: 1. Arizona State: 0. Old Dominion: 0. Southern Miss: 0. UTEP: 0.5. North Texas: 1. Middle Tennessee: 1. Louisiana Tech: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Charlotte: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 4 by 16.7. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Colorado State: 7 by 39.2. Arizona State: 3 by 12.5. Old Dominion: 6 by 25. Southern Miss: 4 by 16.7. UTEP: 1 by 9.2. North Texas: 2 by 18.3. Middle Tennessee: 6 by 35. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 16.7. Texas A&M: 8 by 33.3. Charlotte: 2 by 18.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
39.2 vs Colorado State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs New Mexico | L 20-23 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Charlotte | W 33-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Texas A&M | L 10-23 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 35-63 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 45-25 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs North Texas | W 31-17 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs UTEP | L 49-52 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Southern Miss | W 55-32 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Old Dominion | L 19-33 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Arizona State | L 28-32 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Colorado State | L 14-23 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
TCU
2012-2014
Opening stop
UTSA
2016
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | TCU | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 4.5 | 20.8 | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 4.5 | 20.8 | 3.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Middle Tennessee
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48 takeover score.
#2
Colorado State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48 takeover score.
#3
Charlotte
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 40.2 takeover score.
#4
North Texas
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 39.8 takeover score.
#5
UTEP
0.5
Primary metric
Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 21 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · TCU
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2014 Postseason · TCU
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · TCU
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8785
Martin Luther King Jr. · Lithonia, GA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
49
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jordan Moore quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit