Usage Score
2.7
Player Dossier
2012-2016Texas Tech
Thierry Nguema
DB • 5'10" • Corona, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Thierry Nguema shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
14.7
Consistency
6.7
Season Value
7.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Texas Tech
1213141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Thierry Nguema, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Texas Tech. Thierry Nguema shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.7 disruption score.
Thierry Nguema played DB for Texas Tech. Across 5 tracked seasons, Thierry Nguema recorded 28 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Texas Tech.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Texas Tech paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 14.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Texas Tech
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
14.7
Usage
2.7
Consistency
6.7
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 1. Arizona State: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Kansas: 0. Kansas State: 1. West Virginia: 0. Oklahoma: 0. TCU: 0. Texas: 0. Baylor: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 7 by 29.2. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 16.7. Kansas: 5 by 20.8. Kansas State: 1 by 14.2. West Virginia: 1 by 4.2. Oklahoma: 3 by 12.5. TCU: 2 by 8.3. Texas: 1 by 4.2. Baylor: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 4 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.2 · Games = 5 · +0.2 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · Games = 5 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 5 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
29.2 vs Arizona State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | vs Baylor | W 54-35 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Texas | L 37-45 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ TCU | W 27-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Oklahoma | L 59-66 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs West Virginia | L 17-48 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Kansas State | L 38-44 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 9/30 | vs Kansas | W 55-19 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 59-45 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/11 | @ Arizona State | L 55-68 | 7 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas Tech
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 2 | 14.7 | 2.7 | 1 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.4 takeover score.
#3
Kansas State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 38.4 takeover score.
#4
Arizona State
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 11.1 takeover score.
#5
Kansas
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 8.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Texas Tech
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
41.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · Texas Tech
7.7
2 primary · 14.7 efficiency · 2.7 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Texas Tech
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7907
Santiago · Corona, CA
- Committed To
- Texas Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
28
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.