Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Georgia Tech paired 2,805 primary output with 66.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2013 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 39.2 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 8 | 364 | 131 | 233 | 3 | 39.2 |
| 2014 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 14 | 246 | 125 | 121 | 4 | 73.5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 14 | 2,559 | 1,594 | 965 | 22 | 73.5 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 12 | 1,833 | 1,345 | 488 | 19 | 63.8 |
| 2016 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 12 | 147 | 105 | 42 | 1 | 66.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 12 | 2,016 | 1,454 | 562 | 13 | 66.5 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Georgia Tech paired 2,805 primary output with 66.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 67.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
180.3
Efficiency
67.3
Usage
24.9
Consistency
66
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 147. Boston College: 135. Mercer: 149. Vanderbilt: 220. Clemson: 4. Miami: 101. Pittsburgh: 185. Georgia Southern: 250. Duke: 459. North Carolina: 226. Virginia: 113. Georgia: 174
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 23 by 63. Boston College: 25 by 58.9. Mercer: 17 by 78.8. Vanderbilt: 24 by 77.4. Clemson: 23 by 37.3. Miami: 34 by 45.7. Pittsburgh: 21 by 80. Georgia Southern: 27 by 78.1. Duke: 31 by 92.9. North Carolina: 24 by 74.8. Virginia: 19 by 62.5. Georgia: 17 by 58.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.